All the news not mystical or urban enough for page 1
Monday, October 31, 2016
Why Hillary Clinton's Campaign Is Collapsing
650,000 emails were found on the computer belonging to Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin!
Sunday, October 30, 2016
THE WHOLE WORLD NEEDS TO READ THIS
[I take no credit for the following. It is the work of Australian journalist John Pilger. Please visit his site.]
INSIDE THE INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT: WAR, PROPAGANDA, CLINTON & TRUMP
27 October 2016
The American journalist, Edward Bernays, is often described as the man who invented modern propaganda.
The nephew of Sigmund Freud, the pioneer of psycho-analysis, it was Bernays who coined the term "public relations" as a euphemism for spin and its deceptions.
In 1929, he persuaded feminists to promote cigarettes for women by smoking in the New York Easter Parade - behaviour then considered outlandish. One feminist, Ruth Booth, declared, "Women! Light another torch of freedom! Fight another sex taboo!"
Bernays' influence extended far beyond advertising. His greatest success was his role in convincing the American public to join the slaughter of the First World War. The secret, he said, was "engineering the consent" of people in order to "control and regiment [them] according to our will without their knowing about it".
He described this as "the true ruling power in our society" and called it an "invisible government".
Today, the invisible government has never been more powerful and less understood. In my career as a journalist and film-maker, I have never known propaganda to insinuate our lives and as it does now and to go unchallenged.
Imagine two cities. Both are under siege by the forces of the government of that country. Both cities are occupied by fanatics, who commit terrible atrocities, such as beheading people.
But there is a vital difference. In one siege, the government soldiers are described as liberators by Western reporters embedded with them, who enthusiastically report their battles and air strikes. There are front page pictures of these heroic soldiers giving a V-sign for victory. There is scant mention of civilian casualties.
In the second city - in another country nearby - almost exactly the same is happening. Government forces are laying siege to a city controlled by the same breed of fanatics.
The difference is that these fanatics are supported, supplied and armed by "us" - by the United States and Britain. They even have a media centre that is funded by Britain and America.
Another difference is that the government soldiers laying siege to this city are the bad guys, condemned for assaulting and bombing the city - which is exactly what the good soldiers do in the first city.
Confusing? Not really. Such is the basic double standard that is the essence of propaganda. I am referring, of course, to the current siege of the city of Mosul by the government forces of Iraq, who are backed by the United States and Britain and to the siege of Aleppo by the government forces of Syria, backed by Russia. One is good; the other is bad.
What is seldom reported is that both cities would not be occupied by fanatics and ravaged by war if Britain and the United States had not invaded Iraq in 2003. That criminal enterprise was launched on lies strikingly similar to the propaganda that now distorts our understanding of the civil war in Syria.
Without this drumbeat of propaganda dressed up as news, the monstrous ISIS and Al-Qaida and al-Nusra and the rest of the jihadist gang might not exist, and the people of Syria might not be fighting for their lives today.
Some may remember in 2003 a succession of BBC reporters turning to the camera and telling us that Blair was "vindicated" for what turned out to be the crime of the century. The US television networks produced the same validation for George W. Bush. Fox News brought on Henry Kissinger to effuse over Colin Powell's fabrications.
The same year, soon after the invasion, I filmed an interview in Washington with Charles Lewis, the renowned American investigative journalist. I asked him, "What would have happened if the freest media in the world had seriously challenged what turned out to be crude propaganda?"
He replied that if journalists had done their job, "there is a very, very good chance we would not have gone to war in Iraq".
It was a shocking statement, and one supported by other famous journalists to whom I put the same question -- Dan Rather of CBS, David Rose of the Observer and journalists and producers in the BBC, who wished to remain anonymous.
In other words, had journalists done their job, had they challenged and investigated the propaganda instead of amplifying it, hundreds of thousands of men, women and children would be alive today, and there would be no ISIS and no siege of Aleppo or Mosul.
There would have been no atrocity on the London Underground on 7th July 2005. There would have been no flight of millions of refugees; there would be no miserable camps.
When the terrorist atrocity happened in Paris last November, President Francoise Hollande immediately sent planes to bomb Syria - and more terrorism followed, predictably, the product of Hollande's bombast about France being "at war" and "showing no mercy". That state violence and jihadist violence feed off each other is the truth that no national leader has the courage to speak.
"When the truth is replaced by silence," said the Soviet dissident Yevtushenko, "the silence is a lie."
The attack on Iraq, the attack on Libya, the attack on Syria happened because the leader in each of these countries was not a puppet of the West. The human rights record of a Saddam or a Gaddafi was irrelevant. They did not obey orders and surrender control of their country.
The same fate awaited Slobodan Milosevic once he had refused to sign an "agreement" that demanded the occupation of Serbia and its conversion to a market economy. His people were bombed, and he was prosecuted in The Hague. Independence of this kind is intolerable.
As WikLeaks has revealed, it was only when the Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad in 2009 rejected an oil pipeline, running through his country from Qatar to Europe, that he was attacked.
From that moment, the CIA planned to destroy the government of Syria with jihadist fanatics - the same fanatics currently holding the people of Mosul and eastern Aleppo hostage.
Why is this not news? The former British Foreign Office official Carne Ross, who was responsible for operating sanctions against Iraq, told me: "We would feed journalists factoids of sanitised intelligence, or we would freeze them out. That is how it worked."
The West's medieval client, Saudi Arabia - to which the US and Britain sell billions of dollars' worth of arms - is at present destroying Yemen, a country so poor that in the best of times, half the children are malnourished.
Look on YouTube and you will see the kind of massive bombs - "our" bombs - that the Saudis use against dirt-poor villages, and against weddings, and funerals.
The explosions look like small atomic bombs. The bomb aimers in Saudi Arabia work side-by-side with British officers. This fact is not on the evening news.
Propaganda is most effective when our consent is engineered by those with a fine education - Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, Columbia -- and with careers on the BBC, the Guardian, the New York Times, the Washington Post.
These organisations are known as the liberal media. They present themselves as enlightened, progressive tribunes of the moral zeitgeist. They are anti-racist, pro-feminist and pro-LGBT.
And they love war.
While they speak up for feminism, they support rapacious wars that deny the rights of countless women, including the right to life.
In 2011, Libya, then a modern state, was destroyed on the pretext that Muammar Gaddafi was about to commit genocide on his own people. That was the incessant news; and there was no evidence. It was a lie.
In fact, Britain, Europe and the United States wanted what they like to call "regime change" in Libya, the biggest oil producer in Africa. Gaddafi's influence in the continent and, above all, his independence were intolerable.
So he was murdered with a knife in his rear by fanatics, backed by America, Britain and France. Hillary Clinton cheered his gruesome death for the camera, declaring, "We came, we saw, he died!"
The destruction of Libya was a media triumph. As the war drums were beaten, Jonathan Freedland wrote in the Guardian: "Though the risks are very real, the case for intervention remains strong."
Intervention - what a polite, benign, Guardian word, whose real meaning, for Libya, was death and destruction.
According to its own records, Nato launched 9,700 "strike sorties" against Libya, of which more than a third were aimed at civilian targets. They included missiles with uranium warheads. Look at the photographs of the rubble of Misurata and Sirte, and the mass graves identified by the Red Cross. The Unicef report on the children killed says, "most [of them] under the age of ten".
As a direct consequence, Sirte became the capital of ISIS. Ukraine is another media triumph. Respectable liberal newspapers such as the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Guardian, and mainstream broadcasters such as the BBC, NBC, CBS, CNN have played a critical role in conditioning their viewers to accept a new and dangerous cold war.
All have misrepresented events in Ukraine as a malign act by Russia when, in fact, the coup in Ukraine in 2014 was the work of the United States, aided by Germany and Nato.
This inversion of reality is so pervasive that Washington's military intimidation of Russia is not news; it is suppressed behind a smear and scare campaign of the kind I grew up with during the first cold war. Once again, the Ruskies are coming to get us, led by another Stalin, whom The Economist depicts as the devil.
The suppression of the truth about Ukraine is one of the most complete news blackouts I can remember. The fascists who engineered the coup in Kiev are the same breed that backed the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Of all the scares about the rise of fascist anti-Semitism in Europe, no leader ever mentions the fascists in Ukraine - except Vladimir Putin, but he does not count.
Many in the Western media have worked hard to present the ethnic Russian-speaking population of Ukraine as outsiders in their own country, as agents of Moscow, almost never as Ukrainians seeking a federation within Ukraine and as Ukrainian citizens resisting a foreign-orchestrated coup against their elected government.
There is almost the joie d'esprit of a class reunion of warmongers. The drum-beaters of the Washington Post inciting war with Russia are the very same editorial writers who published the lie that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
To most of us, the American presidential campaign is a media freak show, in which Donald Trump is the arch villain. But Trump is loathed by those with power in the United States for reasons that have little to do with his obnoxious behaviour and opinions. To the invisible government in Washington, the unpredictable Trump is an obstacle to America's design for the 21st century.
This is to maintain the dominance of the United States and to subjugate Russia, and, if possible, China.
To the militarists in Washington, the real problem with Trump is that, in his lucid moments, he seems not to want a war with Russia; he wants to talk with the Russian president, not fight him; he says he wants to talk with the president of China.
In the first debate with Hillary Clinton, Trump promised not to be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a conflict. He said, "I would certainly not do first strike. Once the nuclear alternative happens, it's over." That was not news.
Did he really mean it? Who knows? He often contradicts himself. But what is clear is that Trump is considered a serious threat to the status quo maintained by the vast national security machine that runs the United States, regardless of who is in the White House.
The CIA wants him beaten. The Pentagon wants him beaten. The media wants him beaten. Even his own party wants him beaten. He is a threat to the rulers of the world - unlike Clinton who has left no doubt she is prepared to go to war with nuclear-armed Russia and China.
Clinton has the form, as she often boasts. Indeed, her record is proven. As a senator, she backed the bloodbath in Iraq. When she ran against Obama in 2008, she threatened to "totally obliterate" Iran. As Secretary of State, she colluded in the destruction of governments in Libya and Honduras and set in train the baiting of China.
She has now pledged to support a No Fly Zone in Syria - a direct provocation for war with Russia. Clinton may well become the most dangerous president of the United States in my lifetime - a distinction for which the competition is fierce.
Without a shred of evidence, she has accused Russia of supporting Trump and hacking her emails. Released by WikiLeaks, these emails tell us that what Clinton says in private, in speeches to the rich and powerful, is the opposite of what she says in public.
That is why silencing and threatening Julian Assange is so important. As the editor of WikiLeaks, Assange knows the truth. And let me assure those who are concerned, he is well, and WikiLeaks is operating on all cylinders.
Today, the greatest build-up of American-led forces since World War Two is under way - in the Caucasus and eastern Europe, on the border with Russia, and in Asia and the Pacific, where China is the target.
Keep that in mind when the presidential election circus reaches its finale on November 8th, If the winner is Clinton, a Greek chorus of witless commentators will celebrate her coronation as a great step forward for women. None will mention Clinton's victims: the women of Syria, the women of Iraq, the women of Libya. None will mention the civil defence drills being conducted in Russia. None will recall Edward Bernays' "torches of freedom".
George Bush's press spokesman once called the media "complicit enablers".
Coming from a senior official in an administration whose lies, enabled by the media, caused such suffering, that description is a warning from history.
In 1946, the Nuremberg Tribunal prosecutor said of the German media: "Before every major aggression, they initiated a press campaign calculated to weaken their victims and to prepare the German people psychologically for the attack. In the propaganda system, it was the daily press and the radio that were the most important weapons."
INSIDE THE INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT: WAR, PROPAGANDA, CLINTON & TRUMP
27 October 2016
The American journalist, Edward Bernays, is often described as the man who invented modern propaganda.
The nephew of Sigmund Freud, the pioneer of psycho-analysis, it was Bernays who coined the term "public relations" as a euphemism for spin and its deceptions.
In 1929, he persuaded feminists to promote cigarettes for women by smoking in the New York Easter Parade - behaviour then considered outlandish. One feminist, Ruth Booth, declared, "Women! Light another torch of freedom! Fight another sex taboo!"
Bernays' influence extended far beyond advertising. His greatest success was his role in convincing the American public to join the slaughter of the First World War. The secret, he said, was "engineering the consent" of people in order to "control and regiment [them] according to our will without their knowing about it".
He described this as "the true ruling power in our society" and called it an "invisible government".
Today, the invisible government has never been more powerful and less understood. In my career as a journalist and film-maker, I have never known propaganda to insinuate our lives and as it does now and to go unchallenged.
Imagine two cities. Both are under siege by the forces of the government of that country. Both cities are occupied by fanatics, who commit terrible atrocities, such as beheading people.
But there is a vital difference. In one siege, the government soldiers are described as liberators by Western reporters embedded with them, who enthusiastically report their battles and air strikes. There are front page pictures of these heroic soldiers giving a V-sign for victory. There is scant mention of civilian casualties.
In the second city - in another country nearby - almost exactly the same is happening. Government forces are laying siege to a city controlled by the same breed of fanatics.
The difference is that these fanatics are supported, supplied and armed by "us" - by the United States and Britain. They even have a media centre that is funded by Britain and America.
Another difference is that the government soldiers laying siege to this city are the bad guys, condemned for assaulting and bombing the city - which is exactly what the good soldiers do in the first city.
Confusing? Not really. Such is the basic double standard that is the essence of propaganda. I am referring, of course, to the current siege of the city of Mosul by the government forces of Iraq, who are backed by the United States and Britain and to the siege of Aleppo by the government forces of Syria, backed by Russia. One is good; the other is bad.
What is seldom reported is that both cities would not be occupied by fanatics and ravaged by war if Britain and the United States had not invaded Iraq in 2003. That criminal enterprise was launched on lies strikingly similar to the propaganda that now distorts our understanding of the civil war in Syria.
Without this drumbeat of propaganda dressed up as news, the monstrous ISIS and Al-Qaida and al-Nusra and the rest of the jihadist gang might not exist, and the people of Syria might not be fighting for their lives today.
Some may remember in 2003 a succession of BBC reporters turning to the camera and telling us that Blair was "vindicated" for what turned out to be the crime of the century. The US television networks produced the same validation for George W. Bush. Fox News brought on Henry Kissinger to effuse over Colin Powell's fabrications.
The same year, soon after the invasion, I filmed an interview in Washington with Charles Lewis, the renowned American investigative journalist. I asked him, "What would have happened if the freest media in the world had seriously challenged what turned out to be crude propaganda?"
He replied that if journalists had done their job, "there is a very, very good chance we would not have gone to war in Iraq".
It was a shocking statement, and one supported by other famous journalists to whom I put the same question -- Dan Rather of CBS, David Rose of the Observer and journalists and producers in the BBC, who wished to remain anonymous.
In other words, had journalists done their job, had they challenged and investigated the propaganda instead of amplifying it, hundreds of thousands of men, women and children would be alive today, and there would be no ISIS and no siege of Aleppo or Mosul.
There would have been no atrocity on the London Underground on 7th July 2005. There would have been no flight of millions of refugees; there would be no miserable camps.
When the terrorist atrocity happened in Paris last November, President Francoise Hollande immediately sent planes to bomb Syria - and more terrorism followed, predictably, the product of Hollande's bombast about France being "at war" and "showing no mercy". That state violence and jihadist violence feed off each other is the truth that no national leader has the courage to speak.
"When the truth is replaced by silence," said the Soviet dissident Yevtushenko, "the silence is a lie."
The attack on Iraq, the attack on Libya, the attack on Syria happened because the leader in each of these countries was not a puppet of the West. The human rights record of a Saddam or a Gaddafi was irrelevant. They did not obey orders and surrender control of their country.
The same fate awaited Slobodan Milosevic once he had refused to sign an "agreement" that demanded the occupation of Serbia and its conversion to a market economy. His people were bombed, and he was prosecuted in The Hague. Independence of this kind is intolerable.
As WikLeaks has revealed, it was only when the Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad in 2009 rejected an oil pipeline, running through his country from Qatar to Europe, that he was attacked.
From that moment, the CIA planned to destroy the government of Syria with jihadist fanatics - the same fanatics currently holding the people of Mosul and eastern Aleppo hostage.
Why is this not news? The former British Foreign Office official Carne Ross, who was responsible for operating sanctions against Iraq, told me: "We would feed journalists factoids of sanitised intelligence, or we would freeze them out. That is how it worked."
The West's medieval client, Saudi Arabia - to which the US and Britain sell billions of dollars' worth of arms - is at present destroying Yemen, a country so poor that in the best of times, half the children are malnourished.
Look on YouTube and you will see the kind of massive bombs - "our" bombs - that the Saudis use against dirt-poor villages, and against weddings, and funerals.
The explosions look like small atomic bombs. The bomb aimers in Saudi Arabia work side-by-side with British officers. This fact is not on the evening news.
Propaganda is most effective when our consent is engineered by those with a fine education - Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, Columbia -- and with careers on the BBC, the Guardian, the New York Times, the Washington Post.
These organisations are known as the liberal media. They present themselves as enlightened, progressive tribunes of the moral zeitgeist. They are anti-racist, pro-feminist and pro-LGBT.
And they love war.
While they speak up for feminism, they support rapacious wars that deny the rights of countless women, including the right to life.
In 2011, Libya, then a modern state, was destroyed on the pretext that Muammar Gaddafi was about to commit genocide on his own people. That was the incessant news; and there was no evidence. It was a lie.
In fact, Britain, Europe and the United States wanted what they like to call "regime change" in Libya, the biggest oil producer in Africa. Gaddafi's influence in the continent and, above all, his independence were intolerable.
So he was murdered with a knife in his rear by fanatics, backed by America, Britain and France. Hillary Clinton cheered his gruesome death for the camera, declaring, "We came, we saw, he died!"
The destruction of Libya was a media triumph. As the war drums were beaten, Jonathan Freedland wrote in the Guardian: "Though the risks are very real, the case for intervention remains strong."
Intervention - what a polite, benign, Guardian word, whose real meaning, for Libya, was death and destruction.
According to its own records, Nato launched 9,700 "strike sorties" against Libya, of which more than a third were aimed at civilian targets. They included missiles with uranium warheads. Look at the photographs of the rubble of Misurata and Sirte, and the mass graves identified by the Red Cross. The Unicef report on the children killed says, "most [of them] under the age of ten".
As a direct consequence, Sirte became the capital of ISIS. Ukraine is another media triumph. Respectable liberal newspapers such as the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Guardian, and mainstream broadcasters such as the BBC, NBC, CBS, CNN have played a critical role in conditioning their viewers to accept a new and dangerous cold war.
All have misrepresented events in Ukraine as a malign act by Russia when, in fact, the coup in Ukraine in 2014 was the work of the United States, aided by Germany and Nato.
This inversion of reality is so pervasive that Washington's military intimidation of Russia is not news; it is suppressed behind a smear and scare campaign of the kind I grew up with during the first cold war. Once again, the Ruskies are coming to get us, led by another Stalin, whom The Economist depicts as the devil.
The suppression of the truth about Ukraine is one of the most complete news blackouts I can remember. The fascists who engineered the coup in Kiev are the same breed that backed the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Of all the scares about the rise of fascist anti-Semitism in Europe, no leader ever mentions the fascists in Ukraine - except Vladimir Putin, but he does not count.
Many in the Western media have worked hard to present the ethnic Russian-speaking population of Ukraine as outsiders in their own country, as agents of Moscow, almost never as Ukrainians seeking a federation within Ukraine and as Ukrainian citizens resisting a foreign-orchestrated coup against their elected government.
There is almost the joie d'esprit of a class reunion of warmongers. The drum-beaters of the Washington Post inciting war with Russia are the very same editorial writers who published the lie that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
To most of us, the American presidential campaign is a media freak show, in which Donald Trump is the arch villain. But Trump is loathed by those with power in the United States for reasons that have little to do with his obnoxious behaviour and opinions. To the invisible government in Washington, the unpredictable Trump is an obstacle to America's design for the 21st century.
This is to maintain the dominance of the United States and to subjugate Russia, and, if possible, China.
To the militarists in Washington, the real problem with Trump is that, in his lucid moments, he seems not to want a war with Russia; he wants to talk with the Russian president, not fight him; he says he wants to talk with the president of China.
In the first debate with Hillary Clinton, Trump promised not to be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into a conflict. He said, "I would certainly not do first strike. Once the nuclear alternative happens, it's over." That was not news.
Did he really mean it? Who knows? He often contradicts himself. But what is clear is that Trump is considered a serious threat to the status quo maintained by the vast national security machine that runs the United States, regardless of who is in the White House.
The CIA wants him beaten. The Pentagon wants him beaten. The media wants him beaten. Even his own party wants him beaten. He is a threat to the rulers of the world - unlike Clinton who has left no doubt she is prepared to go to war with nuclear-armed Russia and China.
Clinton has the form, as she often boasts. Indeed, her record is proven. As a senator, she backed the bloodbath in Iraq. When she ran against Obama in 2008, she threatened to "totally obliterate" Iran. As Secretary of State, she colluded in the destruction of governments in Libya and Honduras and set in train the baiting of China.
She has now pledged to support a No Fly Zone in Syria - a direct provocation for war with Russia. Clinton may well become the most dangerous president of the United States in my lifetime - a distinction for which the competition is fierce.
Without a shred of evidence, she has accused Russia of supporting Trump and hacking her emails. Released by WikiLeaks, these emails tell us that what Clinton says in private, in speeches to the rich and powerful, is the opposite of what she says in public.
That is why silencing and threatening Julian Assange is so important. As the editor of WikiLeaks, Assange knows the truth. And let me assure those who are concerned, he is well, and WikiLeaks is operating on all cylinders.
Today, the greatest build-up of American-led forces since World War Two is under way - in the Caucasus and eastern Europe, on the border with Russia, and in Asia and the Pacific, where China is the target.
Keep that in mind when the presidential election circus reaches its finale on November 8th, If the winner is Clinton, a Greek chorus of witless commentators will celebrate her coronation as a great step forward for women. None will mention Clinton's victims: the women of Syria, the women of Iraq, the women of Libya. None will mention the civil defence drills being conducted in Russia. None will recall Edward Bernays' "torches of freedom".
George Bush's press spokesman once called the media "complicit enablers".
Coming from a senior official in an administration whose lies, enabled by the media, caused such suffering, that description is a warning from history.
In 1946, the Nuremberg Tribunal prosecutor said of the German media: "Before every major aggression, they initiated a press campaign calculated to weaken their victims and to prepare the German people psychologically for the attack. In the propaganda system, it was the daily press and the radio that were the most important weapons."
Does Clinton have a Drinking Problem?
"I think you should call her and sober her up some."
That's what campaign communications director Jennifer Palmieri said to John Podesta in the early afternoon August of last year.
Not only do we have video showing Clinton drinking a lot, we have her erratic behavior, mood swings, and her sometimes shouting. Now, we have documents from WikiLeaks indicating Clinton might have a serious drinking problem.
We know Trump is straight edge. Alcohol will never impair his judgment. Nor will it ever cause him to miss an appointment, and Trump will never need to be "sobered up".
That's what campaign communications director Jennifer Palmieri said to John Podesta in the early afternoon August of last year.
Not only do we have video showing Clinton drinking a lot, we have her erratic behavior, mood swings, and her sometimes shouting. Now, we have documents from WikiLeaks indicating Clinton might have a serious drinking problem.
We know Trump is straight edge. Alcohol will never impair his judgment. Nor will it ever cause him to miss an appointment, and Trump will never need to be "sobered up".
Saturday, October 29, 2016
Will Anthony's Weiner Save The World?
Anthony Weiner is under investigation for sexting an underage girl (Protip: don't tweet your meat). Weiner's still wife is Huma Abedin, the head of Clinton's campaign. They shared a computer that has been taken in as evidence. Emails were found on that computer that could indicate Clinton in illegal activities.
No presidential candidate in history has ever been under FBI investigation weeks before the election, until now. This new scandal, dubbed Weinergate, might just sink Clinton's chances of getting in the White House.
If that happens, and Trump wins, the world averts nuclear annihilation.
Anthony Weiner's dick pic might just have saved the world.
No presidential candidate in history has ever been under FBI investigation weeks before the election, until now. This new scandal, dubbed Weinergate, might just sink Clinton's chances of getting in the White House.
If that happens, and Trump wins, the world averts nuclear annihilation.
Anthony Weiner's dick pic might just have saved the world.
Hillary Voters Attack Homeless Black Woman For Supporting Trump
Hillary supporters are bullies. The Democrats are the party of bullies.
"Russian" Hackers Were Really Dutch
The alleged state-sponsored "Russian" hackers who stole tens of thousands of DNC emails, were from the Netherlands. And they didn't need any fancy hacking skills or equipment. They just sent John Podesta a fake email asking him to change his password and he was stupid enough to take the bait.
From the AP:
From the AP:
The
hackers sent John Podesta an official-looking email on Saturday, March
19, that appeared to come from Google. It warned that someone in Ukraine
had obtained Podesta's personal Gmail password and tried unsuccessfully
to log in, and it directed him to a website where he should "change
your password immediately."
Podesta's
chief of staff, Sara Latham, forwarded the email to the operations help
desk of Clinton's campaign, where staffer Charles Delavan in Brooklyn,
New York, wrote back 25 minutes later, "This is a legitimate email. John
needs to change his password immediately."
But the email was not authentic.
The
link to the website where Podesta was encouraged to change his Gmail
password actually directed him instead to a computer in the Netherlands
with a web address associated with Tokelau, a territory of New Zealand
located in the South Pacific. The hackers carefully disguised the link
using a service that shortens lengthy online addresses. But even for
anyone checking more diligently, the address —
"google.com-securitysettingpage" — was crafted to appear genuine.
In
the email, the hackers even provided an Internet address of the
purported Ukrainian hacker that actually traced to a mobile
communications provider in Ukraine. It was also notable that the hackers
struck Podesta on a weekend morning, when organizations typically have
fewer resources to investigate and respond to reports of such problems.
Delavan, the campaign help-desk staffer, did not respond immediately to
the AP's questions about his actions that day.
It
is not immediately clear how Podesta responded to the threat, but five
months later hackers successfully downloaded tens of thousands of emails
from Podesta's accounts that have now been posted online. The Clinton
campaign declined to discuss the incident. Podesta has previously
confirmed his emails were hacked and said the FBI was investigating.
The
suspicious email was among more than 1,400 messages published by
WikiLeaks on Friday that had been hacked from Podesta's account.
Friday, October 28, 2016
Video Proof of Rigged Voting Machines
We have video proof from voting machines in Virginia altering Republican votes to Democrat. Reports are coming in from people voting straight Republican tickets are getting their votes changed automatically. Polling officials respond that "It's been happening."
There are reports from Texas that machines are switching votes.
There are reports from Texas that machines are switching votes.
Europe on the Brink of WWIII
Russia has just tested its RS-28 missile, dubbed "Satan 2" by NATO. It can carry up to 40 megatons of warheads, enough to wipe out tens of millions of people, and, if launched from up to 1000 miles away, can destroy New York and Washington DC before our defenses can even detect them.
The missiles do not carry typical MIRV warheads, but the new Object 4202 hypersonic glider warheads. These new warheads travel between mach 5 and 10 and can take advantage of their aerodynamic shape to change direction, making them impervious to all currently deployed anti-ballistic missile countermeasures.
Each missile can carry up to three hypersonic warheads, and each warhead can wipe out a city or a carrier battle group.
Why did Russia do this? Because they are being surrounded by NATO, as Clinton bangs the war drums.
The UK sent 800 troops to Estonia to threaten Russia with war. Why? Because even though Russia has showed absolutely no interest in Estonia, the neocon cold warriors still think this is the 1960s and the evil empire is trying to overrun Europe. They think Ivan will pour through the Fulda Gap with more tanks than God and reach the Rhine in seven days.
And there is no bigger neocon warmonger than Hitlery Clinton. She foams at the mouth, shouting down Russia, promising nuclear war. She soils her Depends just thinking of 5 billion people being reduced to charcoal by 7,000 nuclear missiles.
Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Romania are being flooded with 40,000 NATO troops, including Americans.
Meanwhile 40 million Russians took part in nuclear war drills, seeking out their local bunkers so they know what to do when the warmonger Hitlery Clinton decides to push the button.
The UK has threatened Spain not to allow Russian ships en route to Syria to refuel at Spanish ports, and so Spain backed down.
Clinton is so worried about the 250,000 people in Aleppo, because only the US is allowed to murder hundreds of thousands of civilians, no one else. It doesn't matter that up to 1 million Iraqis, mostly civilians, died in the war that she voted for. It doesn't matter that she wants regime change in Syria because the elite who fund her want to build an oil pipeline through the country, it doesn't matter that millions more will die if Assad is eliminated, and that billions will die in nuclear war. Clinton has to stare down Putin because he's the only one on the planet who is resisting US aggression.
If you like your world war you can keep it.
Trump said he will negotiate with Russia. Clinton said she will go to war to enforce a no-fly zone designed to eliminate Assad and conquer Syria to get the oil. The choice between life under Trump and death under Clinton is yours.
The missiles do not carry typical MIRV warheads, but the new Object 4202 hypersonic glider warheads. These new warheads travel between mach 5 and 10 and can take advantage of their aerodynamic shape to change direction, making them impervious to all currently deployed anti-ballistic missile countermeasures.
Each missile can carry up to three hypersonic warheads, and each warhead can wipe out a city or a carrier battle group.
Why did Russia do this? Because they are being surrounded by NATO, as Clinton bangs the war drums.
The UK sent 800 troops to Estonia to threaten Russia with war. Why? Because even though Russia has showed absolutely no interest in Estonia, the neocon cold warriors still think this is the 1960s and the evil empire is trying to overrun Europe. They think Ivan will pour through the Fulda Gap with more tanks than God and reach the Rhine in seven days.
And there is no bigger neocon warmonger than Hitlery Clinton. She foams at the mouth, shouting down Russia, promising nuclear war. She soils her Depends just thinking of 5 billion people being reduced to charcoal by 7,000 nuclear missiles.
Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Romania are being flooded with 40,000 NATO troops, including Americans.
Meanwhile 40 million Russians took part in nuclear war drills, seeking out their local bunkers so they know what to do when the warmonger Hitlery Clinton decides to push the button.
The UK has threatened Spain not to allow Russian ships en route to Syria to refuel at Spanish ports, and so Spain backed down.
Clinton is so worried about the 250,000 people in Aleppo, because only the US is allowed to murder hundreds of thousands of civilians, no one else. It doesn't matter that up to 1 million Iraqis, mostly civilians, died in the war that she voted for. It doesn't matter that she wants regime change in Syria because the elite who fund her want to build an oil pipeline through the country, it doesn't matter that millions more will die if Assad is eliminated, and that billions will die in nuclear war. Clinton has to stare down Putin because he's the only one on the planet who is resisting US aggression.
If you like your world war you can keep it.
Trump said he will negotiate with Russia. Clinton said she will go to war to enforce a no-fly zone designed to eliminate Assad and conquer Syria to get the oil. The choice between life under Trump and death under Clinton is yours.
Thursday, October 27, 2016
Clinton Wants Armageddon
Clinton
gave Russia the uranium to build nuclear missiles capable of wiping
out the United States. 20% of US uranium was sold to Russia in a pay-to-play scheme in exchange for Clinton Foundation "donations".
On live TV she revealed that our response
time is 4 minutes, letting them know how far from the coast they need
to park their subs to wipe us out before we even notice the launch. 4 minutes by ballistic missile is about the distance from the coast to Bermuda. If Russian subs are closer to the coast than that, they can launch their missiles and destroy our cities BEFORE our defense installations can even detect the launch. Clinton gave the Russians knowledge on how to conduct a decapitation strike against the US, a first strike that eliminates our ability to launch a retaliation.
Clinton
calls Putin "Hitler" and threatens to start a war when she
gets in the White House. Clinton wants to start a war with Russia
after giving them our uranium and letting them know what our nuclear
response time is. It's almost as if she wants Russia to annihilate
the US.
Wednesday, October 26, 2016
Rigging the Election part 4
In the effort to prove the credibility of the undercover donor featured in the videos and to keep the investigation going, Project Veritas Action made the decision to donate twenty thousand dollars to Robert Creamer’s effort. Project Veritas Action had determined that the benefit of this investigation outweighed the cost. And it did. In an unexpected twist, AUFC president Brad Woodhouse, the recipient of the $20,000, heard that Project Veritas Action was releasing undercover videos exposing AUFC’s activities. He told a journalist that AUFC was going to return the twenty thousand dollars. He said it was because they were concerned that it might have been an illegal foreign donation. Project Veritas Action was pleased but wondered why that hadn’t been a problem for the month that they had the money.
Rigging the Election - Project Veritas
Part III of the undercover Project Veritas Action investigation dives further into the back room dealings of Democratic politics. It exposes prohibited communications between Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the DNC and the non-profit organization Americans United for Change. And, it’s all disguised as a duck. In this video, several Project Veritas Action undercover journalists catch Democracy Partners founder directly implicating Hillary Clinton in FEC violations. “In the end, it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted ducks on the ground,” says Creamer in one of several exchanges. “So, by God, we would get ducks on the ground.” It is made clear that high-level DNC operative Creamer realized that this direct coordination between Democracy Partners and the campaign would be damning when he said: “Don’t repeat that to anybody.” The first video explained the dark secrets and the hidden connections and organizations the Clinton campaign uses to incite violence at Trump rallies. The second video exposed a diabolical step-by-step voter fraud strategy discussed by top Democratic operatives and showed one key operative admitting that the Democrats have been rigging elections for fifty years. This latest video takes this investigation even further.
Tuesday, October 25, 2016
America's Moment Of Truth
Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros’ vision of an open border world
Fact check: Yes, Hillary Clinton wants open borders
Potentially a million Muslim migrants in one Clinton term
German police union chief: “Migrants laugh at our justice system”.
German mayor begs for help to tackle “explosive refugee crime wave”
Migrant criminals causing chaos in German prisons
Migrant rape fears across Europe. Women told not to go out at night alone
99% of migrants in Germany have no job
Most of the Paris attackers got into Europe using migrant routes
Denmark: Muslims stage organised attack against teenagers for being American
Migrants raped woman in wheelchair. Swedes have had enough.
We Want The Truth: My video from December 2015 explaining why Donald Trump is popular
The Invasion Of Europe: Importing rape and jihad
Europe’s Betrayal Of Women
Hillary Clinton’s largest donors
Megyn Kelly Covers "Donald Ducks" Project Veritas Action Video
On October 24, 2016, Megan Kelly discussed the "Donald Ducks" Project
Veritas Action video with Sheriff David Clarke and radio show host
Richard Fowler on Fox
Immigrants! Don't Vote for What You Fled
Many of America's legal and illegal immigrants fled nations that were
ruined by corrupt politicians and failed government policies. But once
here, they support the same things. Why? Gloria Alvarez, Project
Director at the National Civic Movement of Guatemala, explains.
Monday, October 24, 2016
Federal Prosecutor: Hillary Should Have Been Indicted
Former federal prosecutor Joe diGenova believes the recent Project
Veritas video by James O’Keefe featuring DNC contractors explaining
their dirty practices to foment violence at Trump events, is a prima
facie case of federal and state criminal activity.
Saturday, October 22, 2016
Clinton Rigging the Election
Project Veritas undercover videos reveal how the DNC is not only rigging the election, but inciting violence, a felony.
White House Responds to Project Veritas Action Videos
Even absolute proof of election rigging is enough to move the Obama regime.
Friday, October 21, 2016
Absolute Proof the Election is Rigged
From Project Veritas. DNC staffers admitting on camera that they are rigging the election.
Thursday, October 20, 2016
Donna Brazile Caught In Giant Lie
WikiLeaks proved the Hillary campaign received a debate question prior to the debate. When Gyno Kelly put her feet to the fire, Donna Brazile, head of the DNC, turns into some holy roller and talks so much bullshit in an attempt to deflect the question. "Jesus, Mary, and Joseph! Good Lard! You're a thief in the night! Those emails revealing the grossly illegal things the DNC is doing were STOLEN, and that's a violation of one of the commandments! Get thee behind me, Satan!"
No one talks like that.
No one talks like that.
Fact-Checking Hillary Clinton's Presidential Debate Lies
Clinton is the biggest liar in the history of the world, and the most corrupt person to ever run for president.
Possible Voids in the Pyramid
Scientists working for the Scan Pyramids Project used muon detectors to discover two potential unknown voids within the Great Pyramid.
According to the statement, one void is located on the north face of the pyramid behind an area where four building blocks with "chevron" designs (an inverted v-shaped pattern) are visible. The chevrons would not have been visible in ancient times, as the designs would have been covered with casing stones that were stripped off the pyramid centuries ago. In addition, another void was discovered on the northeast corner of the pyramid about 344 feet (105 m) above the ground.
Zahi Hawass, who was the number 3 man in Egypt under Mubarak, says that there's no story here, nothing to see, move along. He says these people "Are scientists, not Egyptologists", so you should ignore the results of the scientific aparatus because Egyptology is a religion, and the official dogma of the religion says there are nothing unknown about the pyramids, because that throws into question Hawass' omniscience, which, as number 3 man, we dare not question.
According to the statement, one void is located on the north face of the pyramid behind an area where four building blocks with "chevron" designs (an inverted v-shaped pattern) are visible. The chevrons would not have been visible in ancient times, as the designs would have been covered with casing stones that were stripped off the pyramid centuries ago. In addition, another void was discovered on the northeast corner of the pyramid about 344 feet (105 m) above the ground.
Zahi Hawass, who was the number 3 man in Egypt under Mubarak, says that there's no story here, nothing to see, move along. He says these people "Are scientists, not Egyptologists", so you should ignore the results of the scientific aparatus because Egyptology is a religion, and the official dogma of the religion says there are nothing unknown about the pyramids, because that throws into question Hawass' omniscience, which, as number 3 man, we dare not question.
Tuesday, October 18, 2016
Nuclear War with Russia
This election is a referendum on nuclear war with Russia. If you want to die in nuclear war, then vote for Clinton. If you want to avoid war and live, vote for Trump.
Sunday, October 16, 2016
Saturday, October 15, 2016
The Media's War on Poor People
THe MSM, Clinton, and Wall Street are waging a war against poor people.
Obama Tells Voters Not To Vote For Clinton
Senator Obama laughs at Hillary Clinton and tells voters why she is the worst person who has ever run for office.
Friday, October 14, 2016
Donald Trump is a Saint
Donald Trump has a long history of random acts of kindness, spending a whole lot of money helping people, expecting nothing in return, bragging to no one.
Hitlery Clinton is a psychopathic monster who hates everyone.
Hitlery Clinton is a psychopathic monster who hates everyone.
RNC Spends $0 On Trump
The Republican Party has spent absolutely nothing on ads, supporting Trump or attacking Clinton. The Republican Party wants Clinton to win.
Trump is the ultimate outsider. The Democrat and Republican parties oppose him, the MSM opposes him, Wall Street opposes him, the gulf oil sheiks oppose him, the globalist banksters oppose him. Trump is the biggest outsider to ever run.
Trump is the ultimate outsider. The Democrat and Republican parties oppose him, the MSM opposes him, Wall Street opposes him, the gulf oil sheiks oppose him, the globalist banksters oppose him. Trump is the biggest outsider to ever run.
Democrats for Trump
800,000 new "Trumpocrats" have signed up to vote for Trump in Pennsylvania. Lifelong working class Democrats are turning out for Trump to oppose Clinton's job killing trade agendas.
Trump Scandal is Bullshit
Paul Joseph Watson and Stefan Molyneux explain why the NWO is desperate and the Trump scandal is the very bottom of the barrel.
"This is THE election that determines the future of Western civilisation."
- Stefan Molyneux
If Trump wins and he builds the wall and the 40 million illegals are deported, or self-deport, the entire Democrat voter base is destroyed and they will never win an election again.
If Hitlery wins and floods the country with tens of millions of third worlders and musloids, there won't be enough tax payers to ever stop the Democrats ever again.
"This is THE election that determines the future of Western civilisation."
- Stefan Molyneux
If Trump wins and he builds the wall and the 40 million illegals are deported, or self-deport, the entire Democrat voter base is destroyed and they will never win an election again.
If Hitlery wins and floods the country with tens of millions of third worlders and musloids, there won't be enough tax payers to ever stop the Democrats ever again.
Thursday, October 13, 2016
Obama Flaunts His Erection while Female (and One Male) Reporters Giggle
And take pictures, no less.
Hey, I thought black guys were supposed to have big dicks?
Guess what, nobody cares, and nobody will care, because Democrats literally can get away with murder. But God forbid Trump says something tame in comparison, and all of a sudden the "sexually liberated" left becomes puritanical!
Hey, I thought black guys were supposed to have big dicks?
Guess what, nobody cares, and nobody will care, because Democrats literally can get away with murder. But God forbid Trump says something tame in comparison, and all of a sudden the "sexually liberated" left becomes puritanical!
Grab 'Em By The Pussy!
We all know, apodictically, that anyone who finds objection with Trump's statements, except for the odd southern belle who gets the vapours at any mention of human sexuality, is a hypocrite and should commit suicide. Southern belles are fine, everyone else, go kill yourself.
We all know that the rappers Obama lets in the White House (by the way, isn't the White House racialist?) make millions off of demeaning women and conjugating the words fuck, motherfucker, bitch, and nigger 50 times a minute, and not one single fuck is given, but when Trump correctly points out, and I know it's a shock to some of you feminazis and manginas out there, but some women want men to grab their pussies, everyone loses their minds!
Now here's a video of Hannah Montana letting the audience at her strip show grab her pussy. Not because anyone, anywhere, at any time, on any planet, would ever find it sexually titillating, but as a demonstration of the hypocrisy of the establishment and the MSM.
We all know that the rappers Obama lets in the White House (by the way, isn't the White House racialist?) make millions off of demeaning women and conjugating the words fuck, motherfucker, bitch, and nigger 50 times a minute, and not one single fuck is given, but when Trump correctly points out, and I know it's a shock to some of you feminazis and manginas out there, but some women want men to grab their pussies, everyone loses their minds!
Now here's a video of Hannah Montana letting the audience at her strip show grab her pussy. Not because anyone, anywhere, at any time, on any planet, would ever find it sexually titillating, but as a demonstration of the hypocrisy of the establishment and the MSM.
Wednesday, October 12, 2016
Hillary Must Lose
Five reasons why Hitlery Clinton, the most corrupt, worst person to ever run for President, must be kept out of the White House.
1. The Democratic National Committee Conspiracy
2. The Media Collusion
3. Unethical Behaviour
4. Her Financial Backing
5. The Clinton Foundation
Clinton is the embodiment of Wall Street and the political establishment. She is the embodiment of everything Americans left, right, and center despise.
1. The Democratic National Committee Conspiracy
2. The Media Collusion
3. Unethical Behaviour
4. Her Financial Backing
5. The Clinton Foundation
Clinton is the embodiment of Wall Street and the political establishment. She is the embodiment of everything Americans left, right, and center despise.
Saudi Arabia Funding ISIS
New from WikiLeaks, Clinton emails to John Podesta reveal that Saudi Arabia and Gutter are secretly funding ISIS.
While this military/para-military operation is moving
>> forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence
>> assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia,
>> which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and
>> other radical Sunni groups in the region.
And these are our so-called allies. Recall that Saudi Arabia and Gutter gave tens of millions of dollars to Clinton. The same people fuding Clinton are also funding ISIS, the enemy of the United States.
While this military/para-military operation is moving
>> forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence
>> assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia,
>> which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and
>> other radical Sunni groups in the region.
And these are our so-called allies. Recall that Saudi Arabia and Gutter gave tens of millions of dollars to Clinton. The same people fuding Clinton are also funding ISIS, the enemy of the United States.
Monday, October 10, 2016
Bill Clinton is a Rapist
"Nobody can dispute the fact -"
"THAT YOU'RE A RAPIST!"
Absolute perfect timing.
"THAT YOU'RE A RAPIST!"
Absolute perfect timing.
Trump DESTROYS Clinton!
That wasn't a debate, it was a fucking blood bath! When he brought up what Bill did, and when Hillary got that rapist out of jail, the camera focused on Bill's face and it looked like he was going to die! This was like Muhammad Ali beating the shit out of a wet sponge, that's how lopsided the debate was.
Before the debate there was a pre-show with Trump and all the women Bill sexually abused. That destroyed Hillary before the debate even started and set the tone for the entire narrative Trump was crafting the whole evening.
Trump hit her nonstop. He dominated the narrative of the whole debate, steering every question his way, running out the clock so Hitlery didn't have time to respond. You could read Hitlery's expressions throughout the debate, no one has ever treated her like this before (except her husband). This was supposed to be her coronation, and Trump just hammered away at every lie she told (he called her a liar like 50 times), he kept quoting Bernie Sanders saying Clinton has poor judgment, he displayed supreme confidence, and was able to convince people that he is an expert on everything Clinton doesn't know about international politics and economics.
Then there was this, probably the most memorable moment of the evening. Hillary said that "It's good Trump isn't in charge of the country," to which Trump instantly shot back "Because you'd be in jail." The crowd exploded!
Trump also made a promise before the audience that as soon as he gets into office he is going to have the DoJ launch a special investigation into all of Clinton's crimes.
And the best part? Everything Trump said was true! Everything he said about Clinton has been verified by facts
Clinton failed on every level. A fly landed on her face, making people associate her with a pile of shit, she utterly failed to defend calling tens of millions of Americans "deplorable," and she blamed her two-face remarks from the paid speech WikiLeaks released on Abe Lincoln! That's a new low, blaming Honest Abe for some dumb shit you've said.
This is how you destroy the political establishment.
Before the debate there was a pre-show with Trump and all the women Bill sexually abused. That destroyed Hillary before the debate even started and set the tone for the entire narrative Trump was crafting the whole evening.
Trump hit her nonstop. He dominated the narrative of the whole debate, steering every question his way, running out the clock so Hitlery didn't have time to respond. You could read Hitlery's expressions throughout the debate, no one has ever treated her like this before (except her husband). This was supposed to be her coronation, and Trump just hammered away at every lie she told (he called her a liar like 50 times), he kept quoting Bernie Sanders saying Clinton has poor judgment, he displayed supreme confidence, and was able to convince people that he is an expert on everything Clinton doesn't know about international politics and economics.
Then there was this, probably the most memorable moment of the evening. Hillary said that "It's good Trump isn't in charge of the country," to which Trump instantly shot back "Because you'd be in jail." The crowd exploded!
Trump also made a promise before the audience that as soon as he gets into office he is going to have the DoJ launch a special investigation into all of Clinton's crimes.
And the best part? Everything Trump said was true! Everything he said about Clinton has been verified by facts
Clinton failed on every level. A fly landed on her face, making people associate her with a pile of shit, she utterly failed to defend calling tens of millions of Americans "deplorable," and she blamed her two-face remarks from the paid speech WikiLeaks released on Abe Lincoln! That's a new low, blaming Honest Abe for some dumb shit you've said.
This is how you destroy the political establishment.
Sunday, October 9, 2016
Hillary Clinton: Rape Enabler
Hillary - the women's rights champion - defended a child molester who
raped a 12-year-old girl, then laughed about knowing he was guilty.
Saturday, October 8, 2016
Milo Yiannopoulos On Fat People
Cultural Marxists are trying to uglify humanity. They are so ugly theselves that they want to make us all uglier to feel better about themselves.
Wednesday, October 5, 2016
Bill Clinton with No Cigar
20 years ago Bill Clinton proposed immigration and welfare programs that are exactly like what Donald Trump is proposing today. You can think of Donald Trump as 1995 Bill Clinton with no cigar.
20 years ago these policies received overwhelming, bi-partisan support.
Today these very same policies are decried as racialist by hardcore communists in both political parties, the MSM, and in academia.
So, what's the difference?
It's only racialist when you oppose the Clinton machine. No one accused Donald Trump of being racialist until he ran against Clinton.
There's something more. The Overton Window. You probably know what the Overton Window is. It is the range of ideas that are socially acceptable. If you want to go from Pax Americana to full-blown communism you can't do it, people will burn you at the stake. You have to gradually move society, reaching the goal of communism after 43 years (it helps when you federalise education). So you propose a Department of Education. You don't want communism, you just want national standards for schools. And people go along because "it's for the children". And you raise taxes, "for the children", and you let tens of thousands of Cuban immigrants in "for the Cuban children". Eventually you can move the window of acceptable ideas so far you've arrived at communism. Now, in the current year, tens of millions of people are rabid, dyed in the wool, foaming at the mouth communists, and they'll kill you if you even mention 1950. You can't mention anything that made America great without being accused of racialism or other bullshit non-arguments (being racialist isn't the same as being wrong). That's why you don't notice getting older, because it happens so gradually.
In 1996 no one would accept class hatred, white hatred, male hatred, Christian hatred as acceptable for politicians to even mention, let alone use as the entirety of their political platform. No one would have accepted taking in 30 million illegals, depressing wages through work visas, trade deals that close down thousands of factories that used to employ the Democrat base and favor countries like China who make trillions through currency manipulation. No one would accept letting in millions of terrorists from Syria, no one would accept giving rioters "space to destroy". In 1996 someone would have knocked your teeth out if you suggested doing any of that. But, over 20 years, the range of acceptable ideas has shifted, very gradually, and now millions of people believe words like "racialist" are the only arguments they need.
The Clintons had to sell border security, and work for welfare, and marriage between a man and a woman, not because they believed any of it, they don't believe in anything but the way the wind is blowing. They had to sell what the American people would buy so that they could stay in power. Now that there are 50 million cultural Marxists in America, whose minds have been rotted by Ritalin and the worst public education in the developed world, the Clintons can bray "racialist!" "homophobe!" "Islamophobe!" and they know tens of millions of people will vote for them.
20 years ago these policies received overwhelming, bi-partisan support.
Today these very same policies are decried as racialist by hardcore communists in both political parties, the MSM, and in academia.
So, what's the difference?
It's only racialist when you oppose the Clinton machine. No one accused Donald Trump of being racialist until he ran against Clinton.
There's something more. The Overton Window. You probably know what the Overton Window is. It is the range of ideas that are socially acceptable. If you want to go from Pax Americana to full-blown communism you can't do it, people will burn you at the stake. You have to gradually move society, reaching the goal of communism after 43 years (it helps when you federalise education). So you propose a Department of Education. You don't want communism, you just want national standards for schools. And people go along because "it's for the children". And you raise taxes, "for the children", and you let tens of thousands of Cuban immigrants in "for the Cuban children". Eventually you can move the window of acceptable ideas so far you've arrived at communism. Now, in the current year, tens of millions of people are rabid, dyed in the wool, foaming at the mouth communists, and they'll kill you if you even mention 1950. You can't mention anything that made America great without being accused of racialism or other bullshit non-arguments (being racialist isn't the same as being wrong). That's why you don't notice getting older, because it happens so gradually.
In 1996 no one would accept class hatred, white hatred, male hatred, Christian hatred as acceptable for politicians to even mention, let alone use as the entirety of their political platform. No one would have accepted taking in 30 million illegals, depressing wages through work visas, trade deals that close down thousands of factories that used to employ the Democrat base and favor countries like China who make trillions through currency manipulation. No one would accept letting in millions of terrorists from Syria, no one would accept giving rioters "space to destroy". In 1996 someone would have knocked your teeth out if you suggested doing any of that. But, over 20 years, the range of acceptable ideas has shifted, very gradually, and now millions of people believe words like "racialist" are the only arguments they need.
The Clintons had to sell border security, and work for welfare, and marriage between a man and a woman, not because they believed any of it, they don't believe in anything but the way the wind is blowing. They had to sell what the American people would buy so that they could stay in power. Now that there are 50 million cultural Marxists in America, whose minds have been rotted by Ritalin and the worst public education in the developed world, the Clintons can bray "racialist!" "homophobe!" "Islamophobe!" and they know tens of millions of people will vote for them.
Tuesday, October 4, 2016
WikiLeaks October Surprise
I feel I need to personally apologise to you, my valued couple of readers.
Julian Assange trolled the world. "We do not release documents at 3 AM."
The press conference was a commercial. He was just plugging some books. He goes on the air with a very poor quality stream, below 360p, with a mic somewhere in the back of the room, and he plugs a book.
Assange did promise to release something every week for the next ten weeks. We don't have ten weeks, the election is in five weeks, pick up the pace and keep this demon out of the White House.
Look, I don't care if it's Trump, or the guy who doesn't know what Aleppo is, or the chick, or Bernie Sanders, just keep fucking Clinton out of the White House.
WikiLeaks Julian Assange press conference from Berlin in 20 minutes.
Spread the word. This is the October surprise.
Julian Assange trolled the world. "We do not release documents at 3 AM."
The press conference was a commercial. He was just plugging some books. He goes on the air with a very poor quality stream, below 360p, with a mic somewhere in the back of the room, and he plugs a book.
Assange did promise to release something every week for the next ten weeks. We don't have ten weeks, the election is in five weeks, pick up the pace and keep this demon out of the White House.
Look, I don't care if it's Trump, or the guy who doesn't know what Aleppo is, or the chick, or Bernie Sanders, just keep fucking Clinton out of the White House.
WikiLeaks Julian Assange press conference from Berlin in 20 minutes.
Spread the word. This is the October surprise.
Monday, October 3, 2016
WikiLeaks Security Concerns
WikiLeaks has canceled its much anticipated Tuesday announcement, believed by many to be a release of documents that would destroy Clinton, out of unspecified "security concerns." The embassy where Julian Assange has been illegally imprisoned, is unsafe. No word for when this announcement will be rescheduled.
Saturday, October 1, 2016
FBI Director James Comey On The Take
FBI director James Comey, the very same James Comey who said he would not pursue charges against Hitlery Roddamn Clinton over her illegal private email server, didn't pussy out because he was afraid of being suicided, like so many people who oppose Clinton. James Comey did not press charges against Clinton because he received millions of dollars from the Clinton Foundation.
His brother's law firm also handles the Clinton Foundation's taxes.
Comey is noted as receiving $6 million in one year along from Lockheed Martin, who is a Clinton Foundation donor, and became a donor in the same year Comey received those funds.
Additionally, Mr. Comey became a board member, a director, and a Financial System Vulnerabilities Committee member of the London bank HSBC Holdings in 2013. HSBC has also partnered with The Clinton Foundation, where records indicate that the bank projected $1 billion in financing through the Clinton Foundation for “retrofitting” 1,500 to 2,000 housing units to conserve energy.
Additionally, Peter Comey, James’ brother, serves as “Senior Director of Real Estate Operations for the Americas” for DLA Piper, according to the report.
DLA Piper is number five on Hillary Clinton’s all-time career Top Contributors list. DLA also performed an independent audit of The Clinton Foundation in November.
Sure, probably none of this is "illegal". These shylocks know how to skirt the law so that their actions are grossly immoral but still just beyond reasonable doubt so that they can remain above the law. People like the Clintons, and the cronies who support them like FBI director Commie, are too big to jail.
His brother's law firm also handles the Clinton Foundation's taxes.
Comey is noted as receiving $6 million in one year along from Lockheed Martin, who is a Clinton Foundation donor, and became a donor in the same year Comey received those funds.
Additionally, Mr. Comey became a board member, a director, and a Financial System Vulnerabilities Committee member of the London bank HSBC Holdings in 2013. HSBC has also partnered with The Clinton Foundation, where records indicate that the bank projected $1 billion in financing through the Clinton Foundation for “retrofitting” 1,500 to 2,000 housing units to conserve energy.
Additionally, Peter Comey, James’ brother, serves as “Senior Director of Real Estate Operations for the Americas” for DLA Piper, according to the report.
DLA Piper is number five on Hillary Clinton’s all-time career Top Contributors list. DLA also performed an independent audit of The Clinton Foundation in November.
Sure, probably none of this is "illegal". These shylocks know how to skirt the law so that their actions are grossly immoral but still just beyond reasonable doubt so that they can remain above the law. People like the Clintons, and the cronies who support them like FBI director Commie, are too big to jail.
Obama Loses Big (For Once!)
28 September, Congress overturned Obola's veto of the 9/11 bill that allows families of the victims of 9/11 to sue the government of Saudi Arabia, which had given aid to the terrorists. This is the first time in eight years that the cowards and cucks in Congress have stood up to Obola. For 8 years Congress has been nothing but a rubber stamp, with Republicans exposing their throats in total submission. Now, with only a few months left in his term in office, Congress has decided to grow at least one ball.
The House voted 348-77, and the Senate voted 97-1, with only Harry Reid sticking by his master. Not a single Democrat took the floor of the Senate to argue against overturning the veto.
“I would venture to say that this is the single most embarrassing thing that the United States Senate has done possibly since 1983,” announced White House press secretary Honest Liar.
Saudi Arabia issued some hollow threats, which Obola reiterated. Echoing Justin Trudeau, the biggest cuck in the entire universe, "If you let your enemies have sex with your wife, you win." But nobody believed that horseshit.
Extreme far leftist Chuck Schumer praised Congress' action in saving the bill that he co-sponsored:
“This bill is near and dear to my heart as a New Yorker, because it would allow the victims of 9/11 to pursue some small measure of justice — finally giving them a legal avenue to hold accountable foreign sponsors of the terrorist attack that took from them the lives of their loved ones.”
For better or worse, 9/11 is sacred for too many Americans to go against the will of the people. It's the one of the few things most Americans can agree on, regardless of whether they are left, right, or center (along with hatred of Wall Street and Washington insiders). Sensing what could have been a career ending move, Congress sided with the American people for once and did something noble. At least this one time I will put aside my disdain and replace it with respect.
The House voted 348-77, and the Senate voted 97-1, with only Harry Reid sticking by his master. Not a single Democrat took the floor of the Senate to argue against overturning the veto.
Reid, the good dog, obeying his master Obola.
“I would venture to say that this is the single most embarrassing thing that the United States Senate has done possibly since 1983,” announced White House press secretary Honest Liar.
Saudi Arabia issued some hollow threats, which Obola reiterated. Echoing Justin Trudeau, the biggest cuck in the entire universe, "If you let your enemies have sex with your wife, you win." But nobody believed that horseshit.
Extreme far leftist Chuck Schumer praised Congress' action in saving the bill that he co-sponsored:
“This bill is near and dear to my heart as a New Yorker, because it would allow the victims of 9/11 to pursue some small measure of justice — finally giving them a legal avenue to hold accountable foreign sponsors of the terrorist attack that took from them the lives of their loved ones.”
For better or worse, 9/11 is sacred for too many Americans to go against the will of the people. It's the one of the few things most Americans can agree on, regardless of whether they are left, right, or center (along with hatred of Wall Street and Washington insiders). Sensing what could have been a career ending move, Congress sided with the American people for once and did something noble. At least this one time I will put aside my disdain and replace it with respect.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)