Christmas Music Sucks

Christmas songs suck.

If you go outside around more than 4 people from the beginning of November until the end of December you will hear Christmas songs and likely nothing but Christmas songs. The problem with Christmas songs is that once you remove all the songs about Jesus, who is persona non grata in today's atheist society, there are all of 7 Christmas songs left. And you've heard all of them. And they all sound the same. And those same 7 songs are played on continuous loop for two months until you start to envy the deaf.

All 7 Christmas songs are shit. They're bullshit designed to make money. Every pop star for the past 60 years has known that producing a Christmas album is guaranteed to make tons of money, because even though EVERYONE has heard all 7 Christmas songs a thousand times, like an Alzheimer's patient, people need to buy the new album that contains the exact same 7 Christmas songs just because a different person sings them. As if they've never heard those songs before.

Why does Christmas exist? It's not to sell garbage to rich people who don't need any more garbage. CHRISTmas exists because of Jesus Christ. Sure, the date is wrong, but Christmas exists to celebrate the birth of Christ. In the modern atheist dystopia people are afraid to offend the one or two percent of extremely vocal atheists and Muslims who see Christmas as haram, we have to create a neopagan alternative to the birth of Christ, and all that's left is making money. Take a listen to all 7 Christmas songs that the big five networks play. They're all about money and materialism. It's a not so subtle subliminal message to get people to spend money on worthless garbage that no one needs or wants. People will buy $400 worth of shit and then, at the checkout counter admit to the clerk that they don't know why they bought all that shit. America gave up producing anything (except cardboard and US Dollars) decades ago, so I have no idea where all these people get this much money to buy garbage. They have to be using credit, which feeds the globalist banksters insatiable hunger for debt.

If we remember Christ more, even if you don't believe, just take his message to heart. We're not suffering from a lack of novelty sweaters, useless gadgets that get put in the garage after a week, and cheaply made toys the Chinese fill with lead, we're suffering from a lack of compassion. Imagine how much better life would be if instead of spending $400 on gifts for people you hate to satisfy your own ego, people spent that money on helping the poor. THAT is what Christmas should be about, not consumerism.

Regrowing the Rainforest

Nicholas Locke shows us how to regrow the rainforest in just a decade.

Why We Should Get Out of Afghanistan

What is the solution to the war in Afghanistan? What does victory look like? Especially if we disregard nation building?

Would empire be considered nation building? Is empire worth the cost?

We know there are rare earth minerals in abundance in Afghanistan, and China is eying them fiercely. There are also unspecified, and largely unexplored, quantities of oil and natural gas. China at the moment is undergoing the most rapid growth of any country in history. To fuel that growth they need to artificially suppress the value of their currency to create massive amounts of debt to fund construction, and they need more raw materials than everyone else in the world combined. China is gobbling up de facto colonies left and right, in Africa and central Asia and in the Pacific. They are working on building a major highway with Pakistan to facilitate trade, and may expand construction into Afghanistan given the chance.

The United States does not operate that way. The United States hasn't taken one drop of Iraqi oil, multinational monopolies who owe no allegiance to anyone have. Some political cronies like Halliburton have benefited, as have the arms manufacturers like Boeing and Raytheon. The only benefit for the US itself, geopolitically, of including Afghanistan into an American empire would be to keep China from getting its hands on Afghan resources, and good luck with that.

If not to reap economic reward from permanent occupation of Afghanistan why stay? It may be because the US has gotten itself into a no-win situation.

If the US cuts and runs then it faces two potential problems:

1. The power vacuum would result in another Afghan Civil War like when the USSR pulled out in 89. Seven years of fighting saw the rise of the Taliban, a brutal, repressive, Islamist theocracy. The Taliban most likely would resume power within a few years, many tens, if not hundreds of thousands of people would die. Islamist groups like Al Qaeda might be given a platform to plan future attacks on the US like 9/11.

2. The US stands to lose face globally by permitting #1 to occur.

The solution to #1 is very simple, secure America's borders at home and forget about the situation abroad. Afghanistan is not a border checkpoint for entry into the US, nor should it be. US intelligence knew about the 9/11 terrorists prior to the attacks, and internal bureaucracy, or stupidity, or inertia, or take your pick prevented any US agencies from acting. As long as the US secures its borders, as long as the US vets people coming in from terror hot spots, the probability of another attack decreases dramatically. It is entirely possible to prevent terror attacks at home, with no presence abroad.

There may be no solution to #2, but that may not be a problem. If the goal is to make America safe and prosperous then why should anyone care about US image abroad? Does China care about how the world views the tens of millions of slave labourers it has, or the lakes of poisonous slag from unsafe mining, or the clouds of noxious smog from its coal fired power plants? Does China care about its image when it extends its reach into the South China Sea, absorbing islets and reefs right off the coast of the Philippines? Of course not. China does what it wants, when it wants, for the benefit of China, and doesn't give a damn about what the world thinks.

But no one cares what China does? The US is different. The US has a "moral responsibility" to police the world and fight for whatever nonsense "values" the EU or Canada says the US has an obligation to fight for.

Actually, no. The US only has a responsibility to itself, just like China does. By embracing the Chinese model of not giving a damn about its reputation, the US government can actually help the American people, economically and in terms of security. What are we gaining from being in Afghanistan? Thousands of lives lost and hundreds of billions of dollars wasted on a pointless war. The war has been going on for so long that no one wants to admit it's pointless, so more lives and money are sent into the trash to keep the system going.

What does the US lose by pulling out of Afghanistan? Nothing. If we secure the border at home then the terrorists won't be able to launch attacks from their mountain fastness in Crapistan, and the world will hate us no matter what we do, so the world can just go pound sand.

Unless President Trump is playing 49-dimensional ninja chess and has some top secret strategy to achieve absolute victory and turn Afghanistan into Dollywood in under a year hidden somewhere up his sleeves, then the best policy is simply to bug out and call it even.

Jim Marrs In Memoriam

Investigative journalist and author Jim Marrs has died recently at the age of 73. Marrs had written the New York Times bestselling book Crossfire: The Plot That Killed Kennedy, laying out the evidence for all the people within the deep state who wanted to kill the President. That book would become a major influence on Oliver Stone's film JFK. Marrs also investigated other conspiracies, involving psychic spies, UFOs, and 9/11.

It seems frequent that when an entertainer dies, when a clown dies, millions mourn as if they knew the person directly, but so few seem to morn when someone important like a surgeon or firefighter dies. Jim Marrs was one of those important people who dedicated his life to telling truth to power and challenging the deep state. He will be deeply missed.

Zhvingnew Zhazhinsky Died and Went to Hell

Globalist scum are just dying left and right this year, aren't they? Zhvingnew Zhazhinsky, the man with the most confusing name in the entire world, dropped dead and is now being roasted in the fires that burn but do not consume. From InfoWars:

Brzezinski inadvertently helped create Al-Qaeda, when he convinced President Carter that running a secret CIA program to launch a proxy-war against the USSR-backed Afghan government was going to “induce a Soviet military intervention.”

“We didn’t push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would,” he said in a 1998 interview with Le Nouvel Observateur.

“The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter, essentially: ‘We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war.'”

“That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it?” he told the interviewer.

“What is more important in world history? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some agitated Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?”

Less than four years later, those “agitated Moslems” would destroy the World Trade Center and damage the Pentagon, setting off the endless “war on terror” that continues to this day.

Zhazhinsky proudly orchestrated the rise of radical Islam so that the United States would be the world's sole superpower, a goal he also admitted had failed, but it was still something he was proud of. Because he's evil.

David Rockefeller Died and Went to Hell

David Rockefeller, globalist bankster trillionaire who never worked a day in his life, dropped dead, at long last, today. In his memoirs Rockefeller admitted that he spent his life sleazing and dealing to create a one world government.

Just a couple months ago Rockefeller got his 9th heart transplant. A child had to die so this evil, worse than Hitler monster could live three more months. A child could have lived 20 years with the heart that Rockefeller stole. Now that heart that could still be beating is in the ground because this satanic evil stole it.

I piss on your grave you globalist piece of shit. Rot in Hell where you belong.

The Oklahoma City Deception - Part 2

Were Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols Al Qaeda sleeper agents?

Fact: 22 eyewitnesses identified former Iraqi Republican Guard Hussain Hashem Al-Hussaini at the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building on the day of the bombing along with Timothy McVeigh.

Fact: Terry Nichols visited Manila several times in 1994 at the same time Ramzi Yousef, mastermind of the 1993 WTC bombing, was in the city planning future attacks.

Fact: After returning from the Philippines, Nichols and McVeigh, who had previously been complete failures at making explosives, managed to construct a truck bomb that was very similar to the bomb Yousef used at the WTC.

Fact: Elements within the US intelligence community did not want to pursue investigating Islamic terrorism after the twin disasters in 1993 of the WTC bombing and the debacle in Mogadishu.

Investigative reporter Jayna Davis was assigned the task of looking into the Oklahoma City bombing the day of the attack. Over the years she found connections to Al Qaeda and Iraqi sleeper agents in the US, along with a plot by elements within the US government to cover up the true nature of the attacks.

Here is part 2 of an interview with Jayna Davis about her book The Third Terrorist and the Oklahoma City conspiracy.

See Part 1 Here

The Oklahoma City Deception - Part 1

Timothy McVeigh, an agnostic, and Terry Nichols, an atheist, were totally incompetent. They'd tried to build bombs before and had failed. Nichols visited Manila the Philippines several times in 1994, supposedly to pick up a mail order bride, but she never went with him. These visits coincided with the time Ramzi Yousef, mastermind of the 1993 WTC bombing, was in Manila planning another attack. Nichols comes back to the US and he and McVeigh coincidentally create a very similar type of truck bomb that Yousef had used in 1993 and use it to murder 168 people and injure 680 others in Oklahoma City.

22 eye witnesses reported seeing a John Doe #2, a dark-skinned man who was later identified through photographs as Hussain Hashem Al-Hussaini, a former member of Iraq's Republican Guard who fled to America after the first Gulf War.

After McVeigh and Nichols were caught the FBI dropped all mention of John Doe #2 and said the case was closed. They were trying to avoid all mention of Islamic terror out of fear of having to go to war in the Middle East to counter it.

Investigative reporter Jayna Davis was assigned the task of looking into the Oklahoma City bombing the day of the attack. Over the years she found connections to Al Qaeda and Iraqi sleeper agents in the US, along with a plot by elements within the US government to cover up the true nature of the attacks.

Here is part 1 of an interview with Jayna Davis about her book The Third Terrorist and the Oklahoma City conspiracy.