A new study from NASA reveals that the Antarctic ice sheets have grown. Satellite measurements over the past twenty years reveal a tremendous increase in the mass of the ice, despite what global warming hoaxers say.
"the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a
year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice
per year between 2003 and 2008."
More snow is accumulating and congealing into ice than is melting. And as the region warms, more moisture is drawn to the middle of the continent where it falls as snow, not only offsetting any losses, but increasing ice coverage. Rather than contributing to sea level rise, the increase in Antarctic ice is lowering sea levels by 0.23 mm per year.
A new satellite will be launched in 2018 (allegedly) to continue measuring ice thickness.
All the news not mystical or urban enough for page 1
Tuesday, November 3, 2015
Friday, October 2, 2015
Homeless Man in Anchorage uses Homemade Spear to Kill Bear
The title says it all. He killed a bear with a spear he made and he has no home. The bear was stealing his food so rather than be a pussy and ask the government to help he killed it with a spear he made out of garbage.
David Tandler is a 49 year old man living in the woods. He killed a bear in self defense and the wildlife agency said that was perfectly legal. What is not legal is the fact that he is homeless. Apparently the "war on poverty" was not a stupid slogan, it is a literal war against poor people.
The story says he was at an "illegal campsite". He's fucking homeless, cut him a break. Where do you want him to live, the Ritz hotel? He's living in the woods because he has nowhere else to go. The government already took everything else he had, now they want to take his tent away and charge him money for daring to sleep on their precious dirt:
"Tandler was issued a $310 citation for negligent feeding of wildlife because food and garbage was present at the illegal camp site and that is what attracted the bears. The camp was already under orders to be dismantled when the incident happened. Those living in camps have several days to clear their belongings before officials step in and do it."
Let the man sleep on your fucking dirt. Are you afraid you'll run out of room in the forest that you have to kick a homeless man off the unused wilderness? It's not like he's sleeping in the parking lot of the capitol building, he's in the woods, harming no one. Leave him be.
David Tandler is a 49 year old man living in the woods. He killed a bear in self defense and the wildlife agency said that was perfectly legal. What is not legal is the fact that he is homeless. Apparently the "war on poverty" was not a stupid slogan, it is a literal war against poor people.
The story says he was at an "illegal campsite". He's fucking homeless, cut him a break. Where do you want him to live, the Ritz hotel? He's living in the woods because he has nowhere else to go. The government already took everything else he had, now they want to take his tent away and charge him money for daring to sleep on their precious dirt:
"Tandler was issued a $310 citation for negligent feeding of wildlife because food and garbage was present at the illegal camp site and that is what attracted the bears. The camp was already under orders to be dismantled when the incident happened. Those living in camps have several days to clear their belongings before officials step in and do it."
Let the man sleep on your fucking dirt. Are you afraid you'll run out of room in the forest that you have to kick a homeless man off the unused wilderness? It's not like he's sleeping in the parking lot of the capitol building, he's in the woods, harming no one. Leave him be.
Tuesday, September 22, 2015
Real Talent
When faced with the certainty that clock boy just took a clock apart in 20 seconds and brought it to school idiots, when they're not shouting
"leave brown people alone", will shout "he's just 14, what do you
expect him to do?" or "bravo, you just outsmarted a 14 year old!"
Well, here's what a 14 year old can do, build a motorcycle.
Haven Jarel built himself a motorcycle and now he's building a car. He deserves the scholarship to MIT. He deserves to visit the President. He deserves the free trip anywhere in the world. He deserves the media attention.
Remember, until the 20th century 14 years old was an adult, with all the adult expectations and responsibilities. 14 year olds have shaped a lot of history and achieved great things. Clock boy was just a douche who caused trouble on purpose.
Well, here's what a 14 year old can do, build a motorcycle.
Haven Jarel built himself a motorcycle and now he's building a car. He deserves the scholarship to MIT. He deserves to visit the President. He deserves the free trip anywhere in the world. He deserves the media attention.
Remember, until the 20th century 14 years old was an adult, with all the adult expectations and responsibilities. 14 year olds have shaped a lot of history and achieved great things. Clock boy was just a douche who caused trouble on purpose.
Moron Clock Boy
Someone recreated clock boy's "invention" in 20 seconds. He's not an engineering genius, he's a pawn being used to manipulate the media. Now he's getting scholarships, he's invited to the White House, he's been given a free trip to Mecca. And when you try to point out the most obvious hoax in the history of the world all leftists can do to object is to shout "LEAVE BROWN PEOPLE ALONE!!!!!11111ELEVEN!!!!" They are filled with such shame over the disgusting lives they live, the most worthless degenerates in history, that they project their self hatred onto all white people.
No one gave me a scholarship when I was the only person at the fourth grade science fair to actually perform a scientific experiment, where I looked at heart rate as a function of age and other health factors. Who knew all I had to do was to call myself Muhammad Hussein and tear a clock apart?
Stop using the bullshit, made up word "islamophobia." There is no such mental illness. It is not in any psychological or psychiatric literature. It's not in the DSM. There is no such disease. And stop saying racialism. Islam is not a race. There are people on seven continents of all races who practice Islam. It's not racialist to acknowledge the fact that most terrorists are Muslims, the fact that Islam has been at war with the West for 1400 years, that they are waging wars all over the world, in India, in Sri Lanka, in the Philippines, in China. It's not racialism, it's not islamophobia, it's not all white people are evil or the evil Jews, and if we just gave them Israel everything would be fine. Israel has nothing to do with the problems in China or the Philippines or anywhere else. It's a total non sequitur. The whole rest of the world is not evil for trying to survive against constant onslaught from the religion of hatred and death.
No one gave me a scholarship when I was the only person at the fourth grade science fair to actually perform a scientific experiment, where I looked at heart rate as a function of age and other health factors. Who knew all I had to do was to call myself Muhammad Hussein and tear a clock apart?
Stop using the bullshit, made up word "islamophobia." There is no such mental illness. It is not in any psychological or psychiatric literature. It's not in the DSM. There is no such disease. And stop saying racialism. Islam is not a race. There are people on seven continents of all races who practice Islam. It's not racialist to acknowledge the fact that most terrorists are Muslims, the fact that Islam has been at war with the West for 1400 years, that they are waging wars all over the world, in India, in Sri Lanka, in the Philippines, in China. It's not racialism, it's not islamophobia, it's not all white people are evil or the evil Jews, and if we just gave them Israel everything would be fine. Israel has nothing to do with the problems in China or the Philippines or anywhere else. It's a total non sequitur. The whole rest of the world is not evil for trying to survive against constant onslaught from the religion of hatred and death.
Monday, September 21, 2015
Dawkins is Right AGAIN!
Remember when that ugly Maoist 18th wave feminazi made a scene when an ambiguously gay man had the nerve to speak to her in an elevator? Richard "Dick to the Dawk to the PhD" Dawkins said it was the biggest non-story of the year. The Amazing Atheist also did a fantastic video about the incident.
Well, Dawkins is right again.
A 14 year old boy from Texas, Ahmed Mohamed, took a digital clock out of its housing and put it in a suitcase so it looked like a fake bomb and brought it to school. He showed it to his teachers and after a few hours one teacher told him to put it away and focus on the lesson and then he caused a scene and was detained by the police for a couple of hours.
He was not a wiz-kid computer expert. Anyone could take the guts out of a digital clock and put it into a suitcase, which is exactly what he did. He did not "invent" anything. He didn't even assemble anything from a kit, he just removed the electronics from an already existing clock and presented it in such a way so that it looked like a fake bomb. Here's a picture, in case you have not seen it:
The boy's father is a Muslim activist. His sister gave him all the answers to say in every interview. The whole story of the genius kid being mistreated because he is a Muslim for bringing in a clock that looks exactly like a bomb just down the street where two men were killed by police when they tried to shoot up the Draw Mohammed event earlier this year, is a total crock of shit. It was a stunt, most likely orchestrated by the boy's father, possibly to make America look bad for picking on the poor defenseless Muslim boy.
And now the boy gets to meet the President! All for a cheap stunt. It's not like we haven't seen this kind of shit before.
Richard Dawkins said on Twitter:
“If this is true, what was his motive? Whether or not he wanted the police to arrest him, they shouldn’t have done so. If the reassembled components did something more than the original clock, that’s creative. If not, it looks like hoax.”
and
“He didn’t only claim to have built it. He claimed, on Youtube, that it was his INVENTION. … Possibly wanted to be arrested? Police played into his hands? Anyway, now invited to White House, crowdfunded etc.”
And Dawkins is absolutely right. This whole incident stinks like a stunt, and the media are eating out of (most likely) this kid's father's hands. They are the dumbest people on the planet who want to be destroyed. They dumb everyone down so they don't protest illegal wire tapping or invasion of at least 200,000 Syrian fake refugees in that no one can pay for.
Well, Dawkins is right again.
A 14 year old boy from Texas, Ahmed Mohamed, took a digital clock out of its housing and put it in a suitcase so it looked like a fake bomb and brought it to school. He showed it to his teachers and after a few hours one teacher told him to put it away and focus on the lesson and then he caused a scene and was detained by the police for a couple of hours.
He was not a wiz-kid computer expert. Anyone could take the guts out of a digital clock and put it into a suitcase, which is exactly what he did. He did not "invent" anything. He didn't even assemble anything from a kit, he just removed the electronics from an already existing clock and presented it in such a way so that it looked like a fake bomb. Here's a picture, in case you have not seen it:
The boy's father is a Muslim activist. His sister gave him all the answers to say in every interview. The whole story of the genius kid being mistreated because he is a Muslim for bringing in a clock that looks exactly like a bomb just down the street where two men were killed by police when they tried to shoot up the Draw Mohammed event earlier this year, is a total crock of shit. It was a stunt, most likely orchestrated by the boy's father, possibly to make America look bad for picking on the poor defenseless Muslim boy.
And now the boy gets to meet the President! All for a cheap stunt. It's not like we haven't seen this kind of shit before.
Richard Dawkins said on Twitter:
“If this is true, what was his motive? Whether or not he wanted the police to arrest him, they shouldn’t have done so. If the reassembled components did something more than the original clock, that’s creative. If not, it looks like hoax.”
and
“He didn’t only claim to have built it. He claimed, on Youtube, that it was his INVENTION. … Possibly wanted to be arrested? Police played into his hands? Anyway, now invited to White House, crowdfunded etc.”
And Dawkins is absolutely right. This whole incident stinks like a stunt, and the media are eating out of (most likely) this kid's father's hands. They are the dumbest people on the planet who want to be destroyed. They dumb everyone down so they don't protest illegal wire tapping or invasion of at least 200,000 Syrian fake refugees in that no one can pay for.
Saturday, September 19, 2015
Making The Desert Bloom
Countries from all over the world are quickly depleting millions of years worth of ground water for shipping food overseas. Saudi Arabia
exported wheat until the wells ran dry, now they're buying land in
Arizona to grow alfalfa which requires 5 times more water than wheat,
stealing all of the water from America. 130 million people in China are
at risk of starvation when their aquifers dry up. The Colorado river is
drained so thoroughly for agriculture that it no longer reaches
the ocean. "Experts" will say oil is the lifeblood of modern
civilisation, but in reality that title belongs to fresh water. The
modern world exists only because of technology to tap ancient water
supplies. When that water is gone the extra billions who were born
thanks to the agricultural revolution of the late 20th century will face
a dire future where food is in much shorter supply.
From the article:
"California is now threatening restaurants with a $500 fine if they serve drinking water to customers – unless a customer requests the water. But the entire state – all 38 million people – drink only about one-tenth of 1 percent of the state’s annual water use. In comparison, farmers, who face no water restrictions, use about 7 percent of its annual water to grow almonds for export overseas."
Meanwhile water is being wasted extracting gas from deep within the Earth instead of being used to sustain human life.
From the article:
"California is now threatening restaurants with a $500 fine if they serve drinking water to customers – unless a customer requests the water. But the entire state – all 38 million people – drink only about one-tenth of 1 percent of the state’s annual water use. In comparison, farmers, who face no water restrictions, use about 7 percent of its annual water to grow almonds for export overseas."
Meanwhile water is being wasted extracting gas from deep within the Earth instead of being used to sustain human life.
Tuesday, August 25, 2015
Deporting Illegals Will Save Billions
Leftists like to say that it is impossible to deport 11 million illegals, despite the fact that people like Stalin were able to ship millions of people to Siberia using 1930s technology. I'm not one to believe that technology has deteriorated to a pre-20th century level in the past 70 years. Well, it turns out you don't have to deport 11 million people, most of them will leave on their own! The non-partisan Center for Immigration Studies looked at the issue and found that “a modest increase in enforcement (such as E-verify or visa tracking)
would cause significant attrition in the illegal population– sending
millions of illegals home on their own at no cost to the U.S. taxpayer.” It happened in Arizona, where 17% of illegals up and left voluntarily in a single year when E-verify was enforced. Try that across the whole of the US and you'll see people flowing across the border in the opposite direction.
Another thing leftists like to say is that it would be impossible to pay for mass deportation, and even if it were implemented the US economy would collapse without cheap labour from illegals picking oranges. Actually, when you run the numbers, the exact opposite is true. Illegals are draining $100 billion from the US economy every year.
Under Donald Trump's plan, if we get rid of the illegals who are a huge drain on the economy, it would be possible to invest that money on things like universal pre-kindergarten throughout the country, a policy I think is totally asinine but leftists love because who doesn't love taking little kids away from their parents and teaching them that fifty genders exist and 2+2=7 if you feel it does?
[T]he government could allocate 60 percent more resources and benefits for returning American soldiers and veterans (increasing the President’s 2016 budget request for the VA from its current $168.8 billion to $268.8 billion)
Alternatively, public schools could have the funds to employ an additional 1.9 million elementary school teachers to help teach young Americans in already-overcrowded schools.
State and local governments could employ 1.6 million more police officers in to reduce crime in gang-besieged neighborhoods.
These savings could the expand the government’s allotment for Emergency Shelter Grants, which provide support for the homeless or victims of domestic violence, by than 400 times its 2014 budget ($250 million).
Everything in the universe has borders. Atoms have borders called electron shells that define chemistry, cells have borders called membranes that regulate concentration of chemicals within the cytoplasm, bodies have borders called skin that keep the organs from falling out and pathogens from getting in, the Earth itself has borders, the crust and the atmosphere keep the deadly environments of the mantle and outer space out so life can exist, the solar system has a border called the heliopause, even galaxies have borders. Why should it be that absolutely everything in the entire universe has borders EXCEPT the United States? And why is it that none of these bleeding heart leftists take these illegals into their own homes to eat their own food, sleep on their own beds, and rape their own children? Because they are heartless evil bastards, that's why. They want other people to suffer so they can feel smug with how generous they are with other people's money and lives. They are sick freaks. Trump 2016!
Another thing leftists like to say is that it would be impossible to pay for mass deportation, and even if it were implemented the US economy would collapse without cheap labour from illegals picking oranges. Actually, when you run the numbers, the exact opposite is true. Illegals are draining $100 billion from the US economy every year.
Under Donald Trump's plan, if we get rid of the illegals who are a huge drain on the economy, it would be possible to invest that money on things like universal pre-kindergarten throughout the country, a policy I think is totally asinine but leftists love because who doesn't love taking little kids away from their parents and teaching them that fifty genders exist and 2+2=7 if you feel it does?
[T]he government could allocate 60 percent more resources and benefits for returning American soldiers and veterans (increasing the President’s 2016 budget request for the VA from its current $168.8 billion to $268.8 billion)
Alternatively, public schools could have the funds to employ an additional 1.9 million elementary school teachers to help teach young Americans in already-overcrowded schools.
State and local governments could employ 1.6 million more police officers in to reduce crime in gang-besieged neighborhoods.
These savings could the expand the government’s allotment for Emergency Shelter Grants, which provide support for the homeless or victims of domestic violence, by than 400 times its 2014 budget ($250 million).
Everything in the universe has borders. Atoms have borders called electron shells that define chemistry, cells have borders called membranes that regulate concentration of chemicals within the cytoplasm, bodies have borders called skin that keep the organs from falling out and pathogens from getting in, the Earth itself has borders, the crust and the atmosphere keep the deadly environments of the mantle and outer space out so life can exist, the solar system has a border called the heliopause, even galaxies have borders. Why should it be that absolutely everything in the entire universe has borders EXCEPT the United States? And why is it that none of these bleeding heart leftists take these illegals into their own homes to eat their own food, sleep on their own beds, and rape their own children? Because they are heartless evil bastards, that's why. They want other people to suffer so they can feel smug with how generous they are with other people's money and lives. They are sick freaks. Trump 2016!
Thursday, August 13, 2015
CIA Busted Trafficking Coke
10 August outside El Paso, Texas, seven minutemen watching the US border made a citizen's arrest of two men who were smuggling over 1000 pounds of cocaine. The two men had valid CIA identification and were driving a vehicle registered to the CIA. The FBI, DEA, and US Customs and Border Protection are working together to get to the bottom of this. The CIA denies any involvement in the incident, though they are known to engage in drug trafficking with the Contras in the 1980s and even to this day in Afghanistan.
Wednesday, August 12, 2015
Book Review: A Time for War
A Time for War is the second book in the fiction trilogy by radio host Dr. Michael Savage.
This book was a good 50 pages shorter than the first one, which is good, because the first one had at least 50 pages of padding. There was only one sex scene in this book, on page 219 (hardcover), as opposed to the fifteen or more in the first book. That's a wonderful improvement. One very odd thing was that there were only a handful of chapters that were all super long. The last chapter was about 60 pages. They could easily have been broken up without losing anything.
A Time for War takes place exactly one month after Abuse of Power, in September 2011. It stretches credulity more than a little that Islamic terrorists working with MI6 would try to set off a backpack nuke in San Francisco and then one month later the Chinese would try to release a deadly plague in the exact same city. I would think SF would still be under complete lock down one month after a failed nuclear attack. I also find it unbelievable that two billionaire industry magnates would be conspiring to take down the US government one month apart.
Then there is Jack Hatfield, the almost super hero of the books. He's a journalist who reported on the first Gulf War and then lost his job in the early 2000s when a media watchdog group got offended by a remark he made regarding Islamic terrorists. I don't know how much money TV journalists make, or how much they can keep 10 years after being downgraded to working freelance, but this guy has properties all over town, a 40 foot yacht, and a fancy car. Money is no object for him, or any of his friends, the near 70 year old mercenary (said to be "older than God") who can beat the crap out of anyone, carries illegal weapons around with impunity, and flies all over the world to help guerrilla fighters take down drug trafficking rings and tin pot dictators, and the straw hippie trust fund baby who keeps getting beat down intellectually (and sadly dies half way through the book). The aging hippie is a hypocrite (he complains about pollution yet his own boat is a gas guzzler) who gives a few strawman arguments that get shot down, then he goes off to sulk about how leftists today have lost their way, having abandoned free love and egalitarianism in favor of identity politics and social justice warriorism. It was difficult to get through the scenes where he was there because they seemed like cheap shots.
Jack Hatfield is also unbelievably lucky. He has luck that does not exist, saving the day with one or two seconds to spare every time. He also has unbelievable charm, able to bed any woman half his age on the planet with a few words except his ex-wife who left with a bald 300 pound lawyer Jack walked in on one day. She pays Jack to park her even more expensive car in his private parking garage to gloat. One is left to wonder how Jack is so lucky, how he is basically the biggest hero in the world, having saved tens of millions of lives twice, and yet his career is still ruined because of what some political action group said about him a decade ago. The man saved not only SF twice, he saved the entire global economy, he's friends with big shots in the FBI, and he still can't get a show on TV. I don't buy that.
One final note, in regard to the nature of the plague germs that were going to be released. I don't care if you swallow a million lethal doses of plague, it won't kill you a million times faster. Your blood will not boil and cause your eyes to pop out of your skull. The bacteria still need to attack your cells, which still takes about an hour per cell. The more bacteria there are the more cells they can attack, but they can only kill cells so fast.
A Time for War never raised itself to the level of excitement of Abuse of Power. It seemed like more of the same.
77/100
This book was a good 50 pages shorter than the first one, which is good, because the first one had at least 50 pages of padding. There was only one sex scene in this book, on page 219 (hardcover), as opposed to the fifteen or more in the first book. That's a wonderful improvement. One very odd thing was that there were only a handful of chapters that were all super long. The last chapter was about 60 pages. They could easily have been broken up without losing anything.
A Time for War takes place exactly one month after Abuse of Power, in September 2011. It stretches credulity more than a little that Islamic terrorists working with MI6 would try to set off a backpack nuke in San Francisco and then one month later the Chinese would try to release a deadly plague in the exact same city. I would think SF would still be under complete lock down one month after a failed nuclear attack. I also find it unbelievable that two billionaire industry magnates would be conspiring to take down the US government one month apart.
Then there is Jack Hatfield, the almost super hero of the books. He's a journalist who reported on the first Gulf War and then lost his job in the early 2000s when a media watchdog group got offended by a remark he made regarding Islamic terrorists. I don't know how much money TV journalists make, or how much they can keep 10 years after being downgraded to working freelance, but this guy has properties all over town, a 40 foot yacht, and a fancy car. Money is no object for him, or any of his friends, the near 70 year old mercenary (said to be "older than God") who can beat the crap out of anyone, carries illegal weapons around with impunity, and flies all over the world to help guerrilla fighters take down drug trafficking rings and tin pot dictators, and the straw hippie trust fund baby who keeps getting beat down intellectually (and sadly dies half way through the book). The aging hippie is a hypocrite (he complains about pollution yet his own boat is a gas guzzler) who gives a few strawman arguments that get shot down, then he goes off to sulk about how leftists today have lost their way, having abandoned free love and egalitarianism in favor of identity politics and social justice warriorism. It was difficult to get through the scenes where he was there because they seemed like cheap shots.
Jack Hatfield is also unbelievably lucky. He has luck that does not exist, saving the day with one or two seconds to spare every time. He also has unbelievable charm, able to bed any woman half his age on the planet with a few words except his ex-wife who left with a bald 300 pound lawyer Jack walked in on one day. She pays Jack to park her even more expensive car in his private parking garage to gloat. One is left to wonder how Jack is so lucky, how he is basically the biggest hero in the world, having saved tens of millions of lives twice, and yet his career is still ruined because of what some political action group said about him a decade ago. The man saved not only SF twice, he saved the entire global economy, he's friends with big shots in the FBI, and he still can't get a show on TV. I don't buy that.
One final note, in regard to the nature of the plague germs that were going to be released. I don't care if you swallow a million lethal doses of plague, it won't kill you a million times faster. Your blood will not boil and cause your eyes to pop out of your skull. The bacteria still need to attack your cells, which still takes about an hour per cell. The more bacteria there are the more cells they can attack, but they can only kill cells so fast.
A Time for War never raised itself to the level of excitement of Abuse of Power. It seemed like more of the same.
77/100
Tuesday, August 4, 2015
Moron Crapitalism
Dan Price, CEO of Gravity Payments, the man who gave away millions of his own money to raise the wages of everyone in his company, is facing trouble. Not because of his policy, but because of something all too common, fratricide. Moron Crapitalists will say Gravity Payments is in trouble because of leftism, but that's patently untrue. Rust Lumbar and Pizzaman Cain didn't actually read the story, they read the headline and jumped on it like a bitch in heat.
What Mr. Price did was not "hurrr leftism!" He owns the fucking business. He gave his own money away. He didn't demand the government increase minimum wage, he cut his own pay to give it to people who worked at his own business. That's capitalism. It's his business, he has the right to do whatever he wants with it. As long as he does not include the government - and he didn't - that's still capitalism.
None of the problems he's facing are from "hurr leftism doesn't work!" His brother, a minority share holder, is suing him, threatening to destroy the company. Now that he gave millions of dollars away he doesn't have the money to pay for legal fees to fight his predatory brother.
Greedy motherfuckers who work for the company quit out of butthurt. They wanted to feel superior to other workers. Other business owners and clients, stopped doing business out of a knee-jerk reaction like all the other people who say "hurrr leftism". His policy to give his own money away did not negatively affect the company, human evil of people who want to feel superior to others is hurting the company.
And it's not even all bad. His business has gotten more clients than ever as a result of his decision. The ONLY problem is the lawsuit. If his brother destroys the company in the critical 18 months before profits pick up then it's over. His brother pounced when the company was at its weakest specifically to destroy it. Had that not happened this might have started a landslide. Other business owners might have had to follow his lead and stop paying themselves a trillion dollars a year by the force of the market correcting itself.
This isn't what the fatass Rust Lumbar or Pizzaman Cain said. "Hurrr leftism!" It's not leftism. He earned that money and he can do whatever the fuck he wants with it. If he wants to give it away that's just as much capitalism as if he wants to keep it to build a mansion he never uses or a fleet of cars he keeps in a garage or a trip to africa to murder animals to make his dick bigger. Capitalism is not the same as greed. You can be very generous with the money you earn. Isn't that what people like Lumbar and Glennard Becklestein say? Rich leftists complain about the poor but don't give their own money away, they want the government to raise taxes. Well here is a rich man who doesn't want the government to raise taxes, he got up off his ass and gave his own hard earned money away and Lumbar and Messiah Complex are still bitching about it. You literally can never win with them. They will complain about whatever you do, and call giving golden parachutes to trillionaires who destroy the global economy capitalism. Well I call it crapitalism and it needs to die.
What Mr. Price did was not "hurrr leftism!" He owns the fucking business. He gave his own money away. He didn't demand the government increase minimum wage, he cut his own pay to give it to people who worked at his own business. That's capitalism. It's his business, he has the right to do whatever he wants with it. As long as he does not include the government - and he didn't - that's still capitalism.
None of the problems he's facing are from "hurr leftism doesn't work!" His brother, a minority share holder, is suing him, threatening to destroy the company. Now that he gave millions of dollars away he doesn't have the money to pay for legal fees to fight his predatory brother.
Greedy motherfuckers who work for the company quit out of butthurt. They wanted to feel superior to other workers. Other business owners and clients, stopped doing business out of a knee-jerk reaction like all the other people who say "hurrr leftism". His policy to give his own money away did not negatively affect the company, human evil of people who want to feel superior to others is hurting the company.
And it's not even all bad. His business has gotten more clients than ever as a result of his decision. The ONLY problem is the lawsuit. If his brother destroys the company in the critical 18 months before profits pick up then it's over. His brother pounced when the company was at its weakest specifically to destroy it. Had that not happened this might have started a landslide. Other business owners might have had to follow his lead and stop paying themselves a trillion dollars a year by the force of the market correcting itself.
This isn't what the fatass Rust Lumbar or Pizzaman Cain said. "Hurrr leftism!" It's not leftism. He earned that money and he can do whatever the fuck he wants with it. If he wants to give it away that's just as much capitalism as if he wants to keep it to build a mansion he never uses or a fleet of cars he keeps in a garage or a trip to africa to murder animals to make his dick bigger. Capitalism is not the same as greed. You can be very generous with the money you earn. Isn't that what people like Lumbar and Glennard Becklestein say? Rich leftists complain about the poor but don't give their own money away, they want the government to raise taxes. Well here is a rich man who doesn't want the government to raise taxes, he got up off his ass and gave his own hard earned money away and Lumbar and Messiah Complex are still bitching about it. You literally can never win with them. They will complain about whatever you do, and call giving golden parachutes to trillionaires who destroy the global economy capitalism. Well I call it crapitalism and it needs to die.
Saturday, August 1, 2015
The Vineyard Workers in Real Life
Company raises wages of all it's employees. Some workers quit out of envy or spite or just plain mean-spiritedness to when they first started, so out of butthurt they quit. They were still going to be paid more but they were butthurt about new workers not having to suffer like they had to so they quit. This is what I was talking about with the schools.
Does he not have the right to do what he wants with his own company, or are the seasoned workers envious of his generosity?
When Dan Price, founder and CEO of the Seattle-based credit card payment processing firm Gravity Payments, announced he was raising the company's minimum salary to $70,000 a year, he was met with overwhelming enthusiasm.
"Everyone start[ed] screaming and cheering and just going crazy," Price told Business Insider shortly after he broke the news in April.
One employee told him the raise would allow him to fly his mom out from Puerto Rico to visit him in Seattle. Another said the raise would make it possible for him to raise a family with his wife. Overnight, Price became something of a folk hero — a small-business owner taking income inequality into his own hands.
But in the weeks since then, it's become clear that not everyone is equally pleased. Among the critics? Some of Price's own employees.
The New York Times reports that two of the company's "most valued" members have left the company, "spurred in part by their view that it was unfair to double the pay of some new hires while the longest-serving staff members got small or no raises."
No one is losing any money. No one is not getting a raise. The only "problem" is that new employees are getting a bigger raise percentage wise than the older employees. People who have been there for many years are still making more money. Hard workers will still make more and still get bigger raises in the future, and slackers will get the boot. It's just this one time the bottom is being raised, and the people at the top are envious. They don't want new people getting more than they used to back when they were new, despite making more now. It's a sin, plain and simple.
How does this policy change hurt the people who quit? Only their pride. They are not hurt financially. They are still getting raises. They are still making more money than new people, they just don't get the ego boost of thinking they're so much better than the new people. I wouldn't care one bit. If I was working at a company for 20 years and I started out making $30,000 and worked my way up to $90,000 and now, 20 years later, I saw that new people were making $70,000 instead of $30,000 I wouldn't foam at the mouth and quit because they didn't have to start out as bad as I did. I wouldn't care one bit. I would still be making more than when I started. I'm not competing with them. I don't have to compare myself to them, only to myself. My situation improved. So what if the situation of everyone else improved? Am I doing better than I was? Of course. So what's the problem? Pride is the problem. Pride is the fountainhead of all sin. It is the greatest evil of this world.
Does he not have the right to do what he wants with his own company, or are the seasoned workers envious of his generosity?
When Dan Price, founder and CEO of the Seattle-based credit card payment processing firm Gravity Payments, announced he was raising the company's minimum salary to $70,000 a year, he was met with overwhelming enthusiasm.
"Everyone start[ed] screaming and cheering and just going crazy," Price told Business Insider shortly after he broke the news in April.
One employee told him the raise would allow him to fly his mom out from Puerto Rico to visit him in Seattle. Another said the raise would make it possible for him to raise a family with his wife. Overnight, Price became something of a folk hero — a small-business owner taking income inequality into his own hands.
But in the weeks since then, it's become clear that not everyone is equally pleased. Among the critics? Some of Price's own employees.
The New York Times reports that two of the company's "most valued" members have left the company, "spurred in part by their view that it was unfair to double the pay of some new hires while the longest-serving staff members got small or no raises."
No one is losing any money. No one is not getting a raise. The only "problem" is that new employees are getting a bigger raise percentage wise than the older employees. People who have been there for many years are still making more money. Hard workers will still make more and still get bigger raises in the future, and slackers will get the boot. It's just this one time the bottom is being raised, and the people at the top are envious. They don't want new people getting more than they used to back when they were new, despite making more now. It's a sin, plain and simple.
How does this policy change hurt the people who quit? Only their pride. They are not hurt financially. They are still getting raises. They are still making more money than new people, they just don't get the ego boost of thinking they're so much better than the new people. I wouldn't care one bit. If I was working at a company for 20 years and I started out making $30,000 and worked my way up to $90,000 and now, 20 years later, I saw that new people were making $70,000 instead of $30,000 I wouldn't foam at the mouth and quit because they didn't have to start out as bad as I did. I wouldn't care one bit. I would still be making more than when I started. I'm not competing with them. I don't have to compare myself to them, only to myself. My situation improved. So what if the situation of everyone else improved? Am I doing better than I was? Of course. So what's the problem? Pride is the problem. Pride is the fountainhead of all sin. It is the greatest evil of this world.
Friday, July 31, 2015
Schools, Adults, and Sadism
Over in Chattooga, Georgia they switched to a 4 day school week last year and say they saved a ton of money, hired more teachers, and improved test scores.
That's all well and good, but I'm not going to talk about that. I'm not going to research the claims, I'm not going to say what I think about four days or five days, because I don't know. I don't have enough data to form an opinion one way or the other. I'm not going to talk about this article at all. I'm not going to bother. I'm only commenting on the knee-jerk reaction I would expect to find in the comments section. Even though children are physiologically and psychologically different from adults people want to make school exactly like work. They want kids to get up at 4 AM and be in school until 6 PM, 7 days a week, with like a week off for Summer and that's it. They don't care what the optimal teaching method is, they don't care how children learn, how children's bodies and brains grow, they want this rigid system that no one in the world uses out of some perverse sadism.
"I had to suffer through school so I want to make kids today suffer ten times more or they'll be pampered! Kids today are lazy good for nothing and they need to get off my lawn! Make school 20 hours a day! They should sleep in school and eat one meal a day like the Spartans. The kid can walk and talk, take it from home and put it in school until age 18 and then the kid can become a cog in the industrial machine so I can collect my pension! No recess, no PE, no exercise of any kind, sit in one place for 12 hours and learn, even though the human brain doesn't work like that, I don't give one fuck about reality, do it!"
If pushed against the wall they'll justify it by saying "Do you think they should make work 4 days a week?! Fuck no! I don't want to work at all but anyone else is lazy if they work less than 120 hours a week."
If making work 4 days a week or 6 hours a day or whatever would increase productivity and grow the economy than fuck yes, change the work week that was designed around an arcane industrial system that only came into existence about 100 years ago and has been rendered totally obsolete. Everyone going to work at 8 AM and working for 8 hours for 5 days a week is an antiquated system based on means of production that no longer exist in a world with global telecommunications and an increasing degree of automation. It is a tradition based on absolutely nothing that has lived out its usefulness and needs to be supplanted with something new so humanity can enter the next phase of evolution colonizing space.
That's what I would say if I had unassailable proof that changing the work week would increase productivity to the same degree that changing the way the schools work (since only the 1970s, mind you) would so dramatically increase learning. The US education system is terminally broken, not because schools pamper kids but because it was an experiment undertaken 40 years ago that has failed. Before mandatory busing of "minorities" into all white neighborhoods to increase "diversity" because "separate but equal" supposedly doesn't work (it absolutely does, black students do significantly better in all black schools by every conceivable metric than in multi-racial schools because learning supposedly makes you look white while being ignorant makes you "authentically" black; in all black schools there is no us-versus-them mentality and consequently students perform much better) the school day could be tailored to fit the students. High school used to begin at 9 or even 10 AM, and in many places in the country it was like that up until the Department of Education was created. But if we're going to bus kids to school then High schoolers have to start at 6 and they don't get enough sleep because that's not how the body works at that age. Other countries have older kids start school after 9 and they have education systems that are incomparably better than the US. But no one gives a damn what the actual evidence shows, they want kids to suffer with the 40 year old tradition because it's traditional.
School is not daycare. School is not supposed to raise your children for you. Get off your ass and do some fucking parenting. You fucked and you had the kid and now it is your responsibility to take care of the kid. School conflicts with your schedule in any way? Too damn bad. When you become a parent your top priority is raising your child. You second responsibility is raising your child. Your tenth responsibility is raising your child. If school conflicts with your job then find some other way to get your kid to school. If you can't do that then work something out with your job or go work somewhere else. You fucked no you have to deal with the consequences and put raising your child first.
That's all well and good, but I'm not going to talk about that. I'm not going to research the claims, I'm not going to say what I think about four days or five days, because I don't know. I don't have enough data to form an opinion one way or the other. I'm not going to talk about this article at all. I'm not going to bother. I'm only commenting on the knee-jerk reaction I would expect to find in the comments section. Even though children are physiologically and psychologically different from adults people want to make school exactly like work. They want kids to get up at 4 AM and be in school until 6 PM, 7 days a week, with like a week off for Summer and that's it. They don't care what the optimal teaching method is, they don't care how children learn, how children's bodies and brains grow, they want this rigid system that no one in the world uses out of some perverse sadism.
"I had to suffer through school so I want to make kids today suffer ten times more or they'll be pampered! Kids today are lazy good for nothing and they need to get off my lawn! Make school 20 hours a day! They should sleep in school and eat one meal a day like the Spartans. The kid can walk and talk, take it from home and put it in school until age 18 and then the kid can become a cog in the industrial machine so I can collect my pension! No recess, no PE, no exercise of any kind, sit in one place for 12 hours and learn, even though the human brain doesn't work like that, I don't give one fuck about reality, do it!"
If pushed against the wall they'll justify it by saying "Do you think they should make work 4 days a week?! Fuck no! I don't want to work at all but anyone else is lazy if they work less than 120 hours a week."
If making work 4 days a week or 6 hours a day or whatever would increase productivity and grow the economy than fuck yes, change the work week that was designed around an arcane industrial system that only came into existence about 100 years ago and has been rendered totally obsolete. Everyone going to work at 8 AM and working for 8 hours for 5 days a week is an antiquated system based on means of production that no longer exist in a world with global telecommunications and an increasing degree of automation. It is a tradition based on absolutely nothing that has lived out its usefulness and needs to be supplanted with something new so humanity can enter the next phase of evolution colonizing space.
That's what I would say if I had unassailable proof that changing the work week would increase productivity to the same degree that changing the way the schools work (since only the 1970s, mind you) would so dramatically increase learning. The US education system is terminally broken, not because schools pamper kids but because it was an experiment undertaken 40 years ago that has failed. Before mandatory busing of "minorities" into all white neighborhoods to increase "diversity" because "separate but equal" supposedly doesn't work (it absolutely does, black students do significantly better in all black schools by every conceivable metric than in multi-racial schools because learning supposedly makes you look white while being ignorant makes you "authentically" black; in all black schools there is no us-versus-them mentality and consequently students perform much better) the school day could be tailored to fit the students. High school used to begin at 9 or even 10 AM, and in many places in the country it was like that up until the Department of Education was created. But if we're going to bus kids to school then High schoolers have to start at 6 and they don't get enough sleep because that's not how the body works at that age. Other countries have older kids start school after 9 and they have education systems that are incomparably better than the US. But no one gives a damn what the actual evidence shows, they want kids to suffer with the 40 year old tradition because it's traditional.
School is not daycare. School is not supposed to raise your children for you. Get off your ass and do some fucking parenting. You fucked and you had the kid and now it is your responsibility to take care of the kid. School conflicts with your schedule in any way? Too damn bad. When you become a parent your top priority is raising your child. You second responsibility is raising your child. Your tenth responsibility is raising your child. If school conflicts with your job then find some other way to get your kid to school. If you can't do that then work something out with your job or go work somewhere else. You fucked no you have to deal with the consequences and put raising your child first.
Wednesday, July 15, 2015
Dinesh D'Souza's Psychological Punishment
Radical leftist judge Richard Berman extended writer Dinesh D'Souza's sentence, overruling the judgment of two court-appointed, licensed psychological counselors. They said D'Souza was sane, he had no signs of any mental trouble or reason for medication and that his counseling should not be continued as he is in perfect mental health. The Clinton appointed judge said "the hell he doesn't need more counseling, I'm going to punish him more!"
At a hearing Monday in Manhattan in which he ruled filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza must continue community service for four more years, U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman said he considers D’Souza’s violation of federal campaign-finance laws to be evidence of a psychological problem and ordered further counseling.
“I only insisted on psychological counseling as part of Mr. D’Souza’s sentence because I wanted to be helpful,” the judge explained. “I am requiring Mr. D’Souza to see a new psychological counselor and to continue the weekly psychological consultation not as part of his punishment or to be retributive.
That's a lie. That's a bull face lie. D'Souza is already serving five years community service and you just gave him four more all for the terrible crime of donating the obscene amount of $20,000 in someone else's name. There are child rapists who don't get punishment that severe. This schmuck judge is out for revenge against someone who exposed his god of god Obola's plans to destroy America.
This rat bastard has no knowledge of psychology. He cannot logically overrule the judgment of people who the court ordered D'Souza to see in the hope that they would find some imaginary problem with him and force torture "treatment" with thorazine. But they said he is sane and that really pissed this leftist judge off so now he threw his weight around and made a psychological decision on his own, without any formal training in the area.
This is exactly what the Soviet Union did with political prisoners. Psychological torture was reserved for the worst of the worst. Thorazine was administered to political agitaters who were so bad they needed a punishment worse than death. Now Dinesh D'Souza was not ordered to take thorazine, that would be to overt for now. After all, this is only the beginning. These people have to seize power gradually, you know, progressively, like a disease.
Good bye America, hello gulag.
At a hearing Monday in Manhattan in which he ruled filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza must continue community service for four more years, U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman said he considers D’Souza’s violation of federal campaign-finance laws to be evidence of a psychological problem and ordered further counseling.
“I only insisted on psychological counseling as part of Mr. D’Souza’s sentence because I wanted to be helpful,” the judge explained. “I am requiring Mr. D’Souza to see a new psychological counselor and to continue the weekly psychological consultation not as part of his punishment or to be retributive.
That's a lie. That's a bull face lie. D'Souza is already serving five years community service and you just gave him four more all for the terrible crime of donating the obscene amount of $20,000 in someone else's name. There are child rapists who don't get punishment that severe. This schmuck judge is out for revenge against someone who exposed his god of god Obola's plans to destroy America.
This rat bastard has no knowledge of psychology. He cannot logically overrule the judgment of people who the court ordered D'Souza to see in the hope that they would find some imaginary problem with him and force torture "treatment" with thorazine. But they said he is sane and that really pissed this leftist judge off so now he threw his weight around and made a psychological decision on his own, without any formal training in the area.
This is exactly what the Soviet Union did with political prisoners. Psychological torture was reserved for the worst of the worst. Thorazine was administered to political agitaters who were so bad they needed a punishment worse than death. Now Dinesh D'Souza was not ordered to take thorazine, that would be to overt for now. After all, this is only the beginning. These people have to seize power gradually, you know, progressively, like a disease.
Good bye America, hello gulag.
Sunday, July 12, 2015
The Coming Ice Age
Scientists looking at solar output claim that by 2030 the Earth could enter a mini-ice age. The sun's output is expected to decline by 60% over the next fifteen years, an event unseen since the Little Ice Age, from 1645 to 1715.
Will this actually happen? The same was predicted in 1978, and when it didn't happen these "scientists" changed from cooling to warming in order to keep their jobs. Now that there have been two decades with no warming they are changing to cooling again, to keep their jobs. It's all part of the biggest scam in history.
Will this actually happen? The same was predicted in 1978, and when it didn't happen these "scientists" changed from cooling to warming in order to keep their jobs. Now that there have been two decades with no warming they are changing to cooling again, to keep their jobs. It's all part of the biggest scam in history.
Sunday, May 24, 2015
The Polar Ice Sheets Have Never Changed
NASA has been studying the extent of the polar ice sheets via satellite since 1979. Over the past 36 years there has been zero net change in the extent of the ice sheets.
Updated data from NASA satellite instruments reveal the Earth’s polar ice caps have not receded at all since the satellite instruments began measuring the ice caps in 1979. Since the end of 2012, moreover, total polar ice extent has largely remained above the post-1979 average. The updated data contradict one of the most frequently asserted global warming claims – that global warming is causing the polar ice caps to recede.
The timing of the 1979 NASA satellite instrument launch could not have been better for global warming alarmists. The late 1970s marked the end of a 30-year cooling trend. As a result, the polar ice caps were quite likely more extensive than they had been since at least the 1920s. Nevertheless, this abnormally extensive 1979 polar ice extent would appear to be the “normal” baseline when comparing post-1979 polar ice extent.
While there was a modest decline from 2005 until 2012 the media berated everyone 24/7 that the world was ending and it was YOUR fault and YOU should feel bad. It's not Algore's fault. Algore has a sea-side mansion that has a larger carbon footprint than 20 normal family homes combined. If he really believed his nightmare propaganda about sea levels rising his mansion would have been flooded already. The fact that his mansion exists proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Algore himself believes global warming is bullshit.
When the ice expanded beyond 1979 levels from 2012 until the present they divert the discussion from today to the distant future when supposedly all the ice in Antarctica will fall into the ocean and kill five billion people, in 2020.
Updated data from NASA satellite instruments reveal the Earth’s polar ice caps have not receded at all since the satellite instruments began measuring the ice caps in 1979. Since the end of 2012, moreover, total polar ice extent has largely remained above the post-1979 average. The updated data contradict one of the most frequently asserted global warming claims – that global warming is causing the polar ice caps to recede.
The timing of the 1979 NASA satellite instrument launch could not have been better for global warming alarmists. The late 1970s marked the end of a 30-year cooling trend. As a result, the polar ice caps were quite likely more extensive than they had been since at least the 1920s. Nevertheless, this abnormally extensive 1979 polar ice extent would appear to be the “normal” baseline when comparing post-1979 polar ice extent.
While there was a modest decline from 2005 until 2012 the media berated everyone 24/7 that the world was ending and it was YOUR fault and YOU should feel bad. It's not Algore's fault. Algore has a sea-side mansion that has a larger carbon footprint than 20 normal family homes combined. If he really believed his nightmare propaganda about sea levels rising his mansion would have been flooded already. The fact that his mansion exists proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Algore himself believes global warming is bullshit.
When the ice expanded beyond 1979 levels from 2012 until the present they divert the discussion from today to the distant future when supposedly all the ice in Antarctica will fall into the ocean and kill five billion people, in 2020.
Monday, April 27, 2015
"Space to Destroy"
What the actual fuck? Giving rioters "space to destroy"? Baltimore mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake should be put in jail for being an accessory to these crimes. This is a felony and she should be in federal prison for what she has done.
Baltimore police possibly murdered a resident Freddie Gray, he was alive when they arrested him and when he got to the station he was dead with a snapped neck and there are no witnesses to how that happened. What, he didn't snap his own neck, that's for certain, so this seems likely that it was murder, or at least negligent homicide and those officers should go to jail for that. But to go from that to destroying the property of innocent people is evil. It is pure evil. Those rioters are minions of Satan and mayor Rawlings-Blake is enabling satanic evil to destroy her own city.
A real mayor, someone who loves her city, would have called the National Guard to shoot these rioters in the face like they deserve. A real mayor would not allow the vermin of the city to trap innocent people in the baseball stadium and turn the streets of the city into Hell on Earth.
Free speech does not include damage to other people's property. Free speech does not include "space to destroy" or to harm the lives of others. That is criminal activity and needs to be punished in accordance with the law.
Hasn't Baltimore suffered enough? It's another city crippled by poverty and bloated, useless government building projects that fail to bring fleeing businesses back. Do these monsters really need to burn the city down like Newark in 1968 or LA in 1992? Unbelievable that this trash got elected in the first place.
News Rundown 2
Drilling for Earthquakes
Pumping water into the ground after extracting oil and gas has been linked with an outbreak of earthquakes in the middle of the US, clustered around Oklahoma. The Oklahoma Geological Survey says that the practice is very likely the main cause of the dramatic increase in seismic activity.
Drilling for oil and gas produces waste water, and this water has to go somewhere, so wells are dug and the water is pumped into the ground between impermeable layers of rock to avoid contaminating the groundwater supply. While the water table may be safe, all that water forced between the rocks appears to have caused nearly ten thousand earthquakes in the past four years, half of them in 2014 alone.
Russia Evacuates Americans from Yemen
The US government doesn't care enough about its citizens to evacuate them from a war zone, unlike every other country on the planet. Thankfully Russia stepped up to become the unlikely hero of dozens of Americans stranded in Yemen. While official US policy is to bankrupt Russia and start a nuclear world war by installing a puppet regime in Ukraine, Russia holds no animus toward innocent Americans caught behind enemy lines and brought them to safety.
CIA Murders Americans, President Apologizes
CIA drone strikes against an al Qaeda compound in Pakistan (or "Pok-E-Ston") in January has resulted in the deaths of kidnapped aid workers American Warren Weinstein and Italian Giovanni Lo Porto. Despite surveilling the site for "hundreds of hours," the CIA was unaware that the two men were kept inside the building.
The President says he takes "full responsibility for all counterterrorism operations." Since the US is not technically at war with anyone, and these covert actions are of highly questionable legality, does that make the President responsible for negligent homicide? After all, these are not inadvertent casualties of war, collateral damage, this is the US government going around murdering people (very bad people, mind you) and civilians getting caught in the crossfire, including US citizens who are being denied their lives without due process of law.
At the very least there should be proper civilian oversight of these drone operations, instead of the cloak and dagger dealings of the CIA. Why are these operations not being carried out by the Department of Defense like military actions? Instead they are being carried out by the CIA like mafia contract killings with no say or restraint from Congress.
Pumping water into the ground after extracting oil and gas has been linked with an outbreak of earthquakes in the middle of the US, clustered around Oklahoma. The Oklahoma Geological Survey says that the practice is very likely the main cause of the dramatic increase in seismic activity.
Drilling for oil and gas produces waste water, and this water has to go somewhere, so wells are dug and the water is pumped into the ground between impermeable layers of rock to avoid contaminating the groundwater supply. While the water table may be safe, all that water forced between the rocks appears to have caused nearly ten thousand earthquakes in the past four years, half of them in 2014 alone.
Russia Evacuates Americans from Yemen
The US government doesn't care enough about its citizens to evacuate them from a war zone, unlike every other country on the planet. Thankfully Russia stepped up to become the unlikely hero of dozens of Americans stranded in Yemen. While official US policy is to bankrupt Russia and start a nuclear world war by installing a puppet regime in Ukraine, Russia holds no animus toward innocent Americans caught behind enemy lines and brought them to safety.
CIA Murders Americans, President Apologizes
CIA drone strikes against an al Qaeda compound in Pakistan (or "Pok-E-Ston") in January has resulted in the deaths of kidnapped aid workers American Warren Weinstein and Italian Giovanni Lo Porto. Despite surveilling the site for "hundreds of hours," the CIA was unaware that the two men were kept inside the building.
The President says he takes "full responsibility for all counterterrorism operations." Since the US is not technically at war with anyone, and these covert actions are of highly questionable legality, does that make the President responsible for negligent homicide? After all, these are not inadvertent casualties of war, collateral damage, this is the US government going around murdering people (very bad people, mind you) and civilians getting caught in the crossfire, including US citizens who are being denied their lives without due process of law.
At the very least there should be proper civilian oversight of these drone operations, instead of the cloak and dagger dealings of the CIA. Why are these operations not being carried out by the Department of Defense like military actions? Instead they are being carried out by the CIA like mafia contract killings with no say or restraint from Congress.
Friday, April 24, 2015
Why "Taxing the Rich" Doesn't Work
There are at least 7 reasons why the idea of taxing the rich and giving it to the poor does not work. I'll break them down for you below.
1. "Not Rich" Syndrome
The definition of who is "rich" is a lot like a number of other terms that belong on sliding scales. Someone who is rich is usually someone who has more money than the person making the definition. "I'm not rich, but that guy over there making $30,000, he's rich." That guy says "Rich? You must be joking! I'm just getting by, but that guy, making $80,000, now he's rich." The third guy says "I'm not rich! Those greedy bastards making $250,000, they're rich, and they should be taxed more!"
2. "Not I" Syndrome
The people who do admit they are rich usually believe they deserve some exemption to having to pay higher taxes. A leftist who wanted to raise taxes on the rich called in to The Savage Nation a few days ago and he admitted that he was, in fact, rich. However, he believed he shouldn't have to pay higher taxes, only other rich people. You see, he takes every tax exemption he can so he only pays a fraction of what a less crafty person would at his income bracket, and he believes that his genius at finding these loopholes means he is entitled to pay less. The caller wanted to raise taxes but did not want to close the loopholes that would shield him from having to pay those higher taxes! Taxes, in this instance, become a penalty for stupid people.
3. Rich People Don't Pay Taxes
The 80 people who possess half the money in the world never pay taxes anyway. Warren Buffett pays as little taxes as possible, so do the Clintons and the Bushes. The really rich people don't get money from income, so they already don't have to pay income tax – the form of tax that people who want to "tax the rich" want to increase, and they have armies of lawyers to find every single loophole to get out of paying the taxes that do apply to them. Warren Buffett always says that income tax should be raised and that his secretary pays more income tax than he does, but what he never mentions is he makes very little income. Most of the money Buffett gets is in the form of capital gains, which he conveniently does not want taxed any higher. He's distracting the public with one hand to disguise what his other hand is doing.
Remember, in the US, the IRS does not care how much you pay beyond the minimum amount you owe. You can legally give them as much money as you want over what you legally owe. If you owe $50,000, you can legally give them a million dollars and they will gladly accept it to buy a new hammer or toilet seat.
4. Corporations Don't Pay Taxes
Just like rich people, corporations (which somehow count as "people" but unborn children are just "tissues") don't pay taxes either. Corporations are to people what Superman is to man. Corporations can deduct expenses, like utilities. If you try to get off having to pay your gas bill or make a car payment you'd get your gas shut off and your car repossessed. A corporation can get a tax break. Corporations can use past losses to offset future gains. In the red last year? It doesn't matter that you've made billions, you can subtract what you didn't make from what you did and get free money from Uncle Sam! Corporations can create smaller, shell corporations in tax havens to launder money and avoid paying taxes. And the big one, corporations that are really super in the red can get bailouts if they have their hands in too many cookie jars. If a big corporation like AIG were to go bankrupt it would cause a depression, so the government can't let that happen. You see, some corporations are "too big to fail."
5. Dekulakization
Whenever taxes are raised the only people who lose more money directly are kulaks. Kulaks are the mythical "tight-fisted" independent farmers (mostly Poles and Ukrainians) who Stalin murdered out of racial hatred while claiming to fight capitalism. In American terms the kulaks are the entrepreneurs. They are the people with two mortgages on their homes to fund a business that employs a couple dozen people. On paper they may be millionaires, but very little of that money is liquid. In fact most of these modern day kulaks are in the red, but few ever speak of real world economics, and so these paper millionaires must be taxed to the point where they lose their businesses. Destroying small businesses is a death sentence for the economy, because that's where most new jobs are created. Raising taxes is like pouring cement into a car's engine.
6. Eat the Poor
The only other group of people hurt by higher taxes are poor people. Fewer businesses means fewer jobs. Fewer jobs means more unemployment, and unemployment tends to go hand-in-hand with being poor. That's not the only way poor people are hurt by higher taxes. Those tax-exempt corporate people can raise their prices if they ever get in a situation where they can't weasel their way out of having to pay a tax, thus forcing poor people to have to pay whatever the corporations owe. Sure, minimum wage might go up every few years, but it's always behind inflation, so an extra dollar an hour is really less than what you were paid five years ago because the price of commodities has gone up. It really is the case that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, whether taxes are increased or not.
7. To Each According to His Need
If we're going to redistribute wealth, and do it globally and do it right, chances are you won't see a dime. A billion Africans take precedent over the average poor person in America, because they are just that much poorer. Poor people in America have a car, a TV, and are obese, while poor people in Haiti literally eat cakes made from mud to eliminate hunger pangs because there's not enough food to eat a real meal every day.
And if we were to do this just in America? The people who would reap the rewards are the same people who reap them now: the welfare scam artists. Deadbeats who have ten children so they can get food stamps to pay for makeup and booze, people living together who all file separately so the household looks really super poor on paper, I've seen all types. There are people who know how to game the system to suck up as much welfare as possible, and they often live better than the people working two jobs who support them with their taxes. Do you think this would change if we just "tax the rich" more? In a country where 80% of government spending on welfare is lost in bureaucratic inefficiency and political slush funds, I don't think so.
1. "Not Rich" Syndrome
The definition of who is "rich" is a lot like a number of other terms that belong on sliding scales. Someone who is rich is usually someone who has more money than the person making the definition. "I'm not rich, but that guy over there making $30,000, he's rich." That guy says "Rich? You must be joking! I'm just getting by, but that guy, making $80,000, now he's rich." The third guy says "I'm not rich! Those greedy bastards making $250,000, they're rich, and they should be taxed more!"
2. "Not I" Syndrome
The people who do admit they are rich usually believe they deserve some exemption to having to pay higher taxes. A leftist who wanted to raise taxes on the rich called in to The Savage Nation a few days ago and he admitted that he was, in fact, rich. However, he believed he shouldn't have to pay higher taxes, only other rich people. You see, he takes every tax exemption he can so he only pays a fraction of what a less crafty person would at his income bracket, and he believes that his genius at finding these loopholes means he is entitled to pay less. The caller wanted to raise taxes but did not want to close the loopholes that would shield him from having to pay those higher taxes! Taxes, in this instance, become a penalty for stupid people.
3. Rich People Don't Pay Taxes
The 80 people who possess half the money in the world never pay taxes anyway. Warren Buffett pays as little taxes as possible, so do the Clintons and the Bushes. The really rich people don't get money from income, so they already don't have to pay income tax – the form of tax that people who want to "tax the rich" want to increase, and they have armies of lawyers to find every single loophole to get out of paying the taxes that do apply to them. Warren Buffett always says that income tax should be raised and that his secretary pays more income tax than he does, but what he never mentions is he makes very little income. Most of the money Buffett gets is in the form of capital gains, which he conveniently does not want taxed any higher. He's distracting the public with one hand to disguise what his other hand is doing.
Remember, in the US, the IRS does not care how much you pay beyond the minimum amount you owe. You can legally give them as much money as you want over what you legally owe. If you owe $50,000, you can legally give them a million dollars and they will gladly accept it to buy a new hammer or toilet seat.
4. Corporations Don't Pay Taxes
Just like rich people, corporations (which somehow count as "people" but unborn children are just "tissues") don't pay taxes either. Corporations are to people what Superman is to man. Corporations can deduct expenses, like utilities. If you try to get off having to pay your gas bill or make a car payment you'd get your gas shut off and your car repossessed. A corporation can get a tax break. Corporations can use past losses to offset future gains. In the red last year? It doesn't matter that you've made billions, you can subtract what you didn't make from what you did and get free money from Uncle Sam! Corporations can create smaller, shell corporations in tax havens to launder money and avoid paying taxes. And the big one, corporations that are really super in the red can get bailouts if they have their hands in too many cookie jars. If a big corporation like AIG were to go bankrupt it would cause a depression, so the government can't let that happen. You see, some corporations are "too big to fail."
5. Dekulakization
Whenever taxes are raised the only people who lose more money directly are kulaks. Kulaks are the mythical "tight-fisted" independent farmers (mostly Poles and Ukrainians) who Stalin murdered out of racial hatred while claiming to fight capitalism. In American terms the kulaks are the entrepreneurs. They are the people with two mortgages on their homes to fund a business that employs a couple dozen people. On paper they may be millionaires, but very little of that money is liquid. In fact most of these modern day kulaks are in the red, but few ever speak of real world economics, and so these paper millionaires must be taxed to the point where they lose their businesses. Destroying small businesses is a death sentence for the economy, because that's where most new jobs are created. Raising taxes is like pouring cement into a car's engine.
6. Eat the Poor
The only other group of people hurt by higher taxes are poor people. Fewer businesses means fewer jobs. Fewer jobs means more unemployment, and unemployment tends to go hand-in-hand with being poor. That's not the only way poor people are hurt by higher taxes. Those tax-exempt corporate people can raise their prices if they ever get in a situation where they can't weasel their way out of having to pay a tax, thus forcing poor people to have to pay whatever the corporations owe. Sure, minimum wage might go up every few years, but it's always behind inflation, so an extra dollar an hour is really less than what you were paid five years ago because the price of commodities has gone up. It really is the case that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, whether taxes are increased or not.
7. To Each According to His Need
If we're going to redistribute wealth, and do it globally and do it right, chances are you won't see a dime. A billion Africans take precedent over the average poor person in America, because they are just that much poorer. Poor people in America have a car, a TV, and are obese, while poor people in Haiti literally eat cakes made from mud to eliminate hunger pangs because there's not enough food to eat a real meal every day.
And if we were to do this just in America? The people who would reap the rewards are the same people who reap them now: the welfare scam artists. Deadbeats who have ten children so they can get food stamps to pay for makeup and booze, people living together who all file separately so the household looks really super poor on paper, I've seen all types. There are people who know how to game the system to suck up as much welfare as possible, and they often live better than the people working two jobs who support them with their taxes. Do you think this would change if we just "tax the rich" more? In a country where 80% of government spending on welfare is lost in bureaucratic inefficiency and political slush funds, I don't think so.
Tuesday, April 7, 2015
Obama Mentor Repudiates Him
Harvard University law professor Laurence Tribe, a mentor to President
Barack Obama, said the administration’s carbon rule for power plants is
“a remarkable example of executive overreach” that raises “serious
constitutional questions.”
The EPA plan violates the Fifth Amendment, because it takes private property without due process.
Tribe says that this is an attack against the coal industry (which Obama said he would do when he was running for president), and contradicts the Clean Air Act, indicating a separation of powers issue.
You cannot be a liberal and love this president. Not by any definition of the word, the original or the modern. He is a dictator. The only people who still support this president in 2015 are egotistical monsters who believe they know better than everyone else and believe that they should rule everyone else and take away people's free will. That's it. This was never a political issue. I've been saying it for years, this isn't about left and right, we can always disagree on that, this is about right and wrong. The only people who support a dictator are they who are immoral.
Here is Tribe's opening statement where he states that the president is burning the Constitution:
Here's part of what Tribe submitted prior to the hearing in December of 2014:
The defects in the Proposed Rule transcend political affiliations and policy positions and cut across partisan lines. The central principle at stake is the rule of law – the basic premise that EPA must comply with fundamental statutory and constitutional requirements in carrying out its mission. The Proposed Rule should be withdrawn. It is a remarkable example of executive overreach and an administrative agency’s assertion of power beyond its statutory authority. Indeed, the Proposed Rule raises serious constitutional questions.
Both Democrats and Republicans should stand in strong support of the rule of law.
And here you can read his testimony before Congress.
The EPA plan violates the Fifth Amendment, because it takes private property without due process.
Tribe says that this is an attack against the coal industry (which Obama said he would do when he was running for president), and contradicts the Clean Air Act, indicating a separation of powers issue.
You cannot be a liberal and love this president. Not by any definition of the word, the original or the modern. He is a dictator. The only people who still support this president in 2015 are egotistical monsters who believe they know better than everyone else and believe that they should rule everyone else and take away people's free will. That's it. This was never a political issue. I've been saying it for years, this isn't about left and right, we can always disagree on that, this is about right and wrong. The only people who support a dictator are they who are immoral.
Here is Tribe's opening statement where he states that the president is burning the Constitution:
Here's part of what Tribe submitted prior to the hearing in December of 2014:
The defects in the Proposed Rule transcend political affiliations and policy positions and cut across partisan lines. The central principle at stake is the rule of law – the basic premise that EPA must comply with fundamental statutory and constitutional requirements in carrying out its mission. The Proposed Rule should be withdrawn. It is a remarkable example of executive overreach and an administrative agency’s assertion of power beyond its statutory authority. Indeed, the Proposed Rule raises serious constitutional questions.
Both Democrats and Republicans should stand in strong support of the rule of law.
And here you can read his testimony before Congress.
Friday, April 3, 2015
NSA Gate Crashers Update
If you'll remember from Monday:
Two unidentified "men dressed as women" ram the gate at the NSA at Fort Meade in Maryland and shoot up the place. We don't know who they are, whether they're Muslims or not, or what the phrase "dressed as women" means.
Now they've released more information:
The FBI has identified two people who were shot outside the National Security Agency's headquarters on Monday after allegedly stealing an SUV they were driving from a motel.
Kevin Lamont Fleming, 20, and his friend Ricky 'Maya' Shawatza Hall, 27, were allegedly picked up in Baltimore by another man on Sunday night before 'partying' at nearby lodgings in Howard County.
Hall was a homeless transgender prostitute with a long list of felony convictions. The unconscious Fleming is also a criminal. They were at a motel in Baltimore to "party" when they stole a van and somehow drove to the NSA building where a shootout took place. Cocaine, found in the van, may have played a part in the pair's erratic behavior, although their criminal records attest to their being erratic for a long time prior to the deadly shooting.
I'm quite honestly flummoxed by this one. We're either dealing with two people who were just off the nut or there may be a terror connection that is being covered up.
Two unidentified "men dressed as women" ram the gate at the NSA at Fort Meade in Maryland and shoot up the place. We don't know who they are, whether they're Muslims or not, or what the phrase "dressed as women" means.
Now they've released more information:
The FBI has identified two people who were shot outside the National Security Agency's headquarters on Monday after allegedly stealing an SUV they were driving from a motel.
Kevin Lamont Fleming, 20, and his friend Ricky 'Maya' Shawatza Hall, 27, were allegedly picked up in Baltimore by another man on Sunday night before 'partying' at nearby lodgings in Howard County.
Hall was a homeless transgender prostitute with a long list of felony convictions. The unconscious Fleming is also a criminal. They were at a motel in Baltimore to "party" when they stole a van and somehow drove to the NSA building where a shootout took place. Cocaine, found in the van, may have played a part in the pair's erratic behavior, although their criminal records attest to their being erratic for a long time prior to the deadly shooting.
I'm quite honestly flummoxed by this one. We're either dealing with two people who were just off the nut or there may be a terror connection that is being covered up.
Tuesday, March 31, 2015
How to Keep Clinton Out of Office
Hitlery Roddamn Clinton is guilty of crimes that would prevent her from ever holding office again, keeping her from ever becoming president.
If anyone had the stones to bring her up on charges and convict her. And if Obola didn't pardon her.
In other words there is nothing standing in her way from ruling the country.
Runs 7 minutes.
If anyone had the stones to bring her up on charges and convict her. And if Obola didn't pardon her.
In other words there is nothing standing in her way from ruling the country.
Runs 7 minutes.
News Rundown 1
NSA Gate Crashers
Two unidentified "men dressed as women" ram the gate at the NSA at Fort Meade in Maryland and shoot up the place. We don't know who they are, whether they're Muslims or not, or what the phrase "dressed as women" means. Were the in burkas? Were they in drag? Were they attractive women? All we know is that they "think it isn't terrorism." Two guys shoot up a government facility and you "think" it isn't terrorism? I would "think" it is de facto terrorism, but I don't think with my asshole like politicians do, so what do I know?
Germanwings Disaster
Pilot Andreas Lubitz was found to possess a "small mountain" of drugs, believed to be antidepressants, at his apartment. He was researching suicide on the Internet according to an investigation of his computer. He was not only dealing with depression, but also vision problems and issues with his sexuality, and was concerned that one or more of these issues would cost him his job.
People on antidepressants should not be allowed to pilot a plane, especially a passenger jet. People drunk off alcohol or stoned off marijuana or certain prescription medication are not allowed to drive or pilot a plane, you would think that people who are contemplating suicide and are taking drugs to deal with depression would be the last people anyone would want in control of the lives of hundreds of other people. Not to mention the fact that these antidepressant drugs are very dangerous. They rot the brain. All the mass murders that have taken place in the past two decades are either the result of terrorists or people on these psychotropic drugs. All the school shootings are done by people on these drugs. They make people violent and release inhibition, just like alcohol.
Two unidentified "men dressed as women" ram the gate at the NSA at Fort Meade in Maryland and shoot up the place. We don't know who they are, whether they're Muslims or not, or what the phrase "dressed as women" means. Were the in burkas? Were they in drag? Were they attractive women? All we know is that they "think it isn't terrorism." Two guys shoot up a government facility and you "think" it isn't terrorism? I would "think" it is de facto terrorism, but I don't think with my asshole like politicians do, so what do I know?
Germanwings Disaster
Pilot Andreas Lubitz was found to possess a "small mountain" of drugs, believed to be antidepressants, at his apartment. He was researching suicide on the Internet according to an investigation of his computer. He was not only dealing with depression, but also vision problems and issues with his sexuality, and was concerned that one or more of these issues would cost him his job.
People on antidepressants should not be allowed to pilot a plane, especially a passenger jet. People drunk off alcohol or stoned off marijuana or certain prescription medication are not allowed to drive or pilot a plane, you would think that people who are contemplating suicide and are taking drugs to deal with depression would be the last people anyone would want in control of the lives of hundreds of other people. Not to mention the fact that these antidepressant drugs are very dangerous. They rot the brain. All the mass murders that have taken place in the past two decades are either the result of terrorists or people on these psychotropic drugs. All the school shootings are done by people on these drugs. They make people violent and release inhibition, just like alcohol.
Tuesday, March 24, 2015
Moron Global Warming
Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore says global warming (climate change) is horseshit.
Patrick Moore is a real environmentalist. He supports nuclear power because it's clean, not wind turbines that don't generate any power, still require oil, and kill millions of endangered birds, are loud, and ugly. He left Greenpeace in 1986 because they don't care about the environment, they just want to create global communism.
If all the evidence proving global warming to be a lie were put in one place the Shannon entropy would be so great it would collapse in on itself and form a black hole that would destroy the Earth. Global warming is the single biggest lie ever told in the entire history of the universe.
Here's what he has to say about CO2:
Over the past 150 million years, carbon dioxide had been drawn down steadily (by plants) from about 3,000 parts per million to about 280 parts per million before the Industrial Revolution. If this trend continued, the carbon dioxide level would have become too low to support life on Earth. Human fossil fuel use and clearing land for crops have boosted carbon dioxide from its lowest level in the history of the Earth back to 400 parts per million today.
At 400 parts per million, all our food crops, forests, and natural ecosystems are still on a starvation diet for carbon dioxide. The optimum level of carbon dioxide for plant growth, given enough water and nutrients, is about 1,500 parts per million, nearly four times higher than today. Greenhouse growers inject carbon-dioxide to increase yields. Farms and forests will produce more if carbon-dioxide keeps rising.
We have no proof increased carbon dioxide is responsible for the earth’s slight warming over the past 300 years. There has been no significant warming for 18 years while we have emitted 25 per cent of all the carbon dioxide ever emitted. Carbon dioxide is vital for life on Earth and plants would like more of it. Which should we emphasize to our children?
Patrick Moore is a real environmentalist. He supports nuclear power because it's clean, not wind turbines that don't generate any power, still require oil, and kill millions of endangered birds, are loud, and ugly. He left Greenpeace in 1986 because they don't care about the environment, they just want to create global communism.
If all the evidence proving global warming to be a lie were put in one place the Shannon entropy would be so great it would collapse in on itself and form a black hole that would destroy the Earth. Global warming is the single biggest lie ever told in the entire history of the universe.
Here's what he has to say about CO2:
Over the past 150 million years, carbon dioxide had been drawn down steadily (by plants) from about 3,000 parts per million to about 280 parts per million before the Industrial Revolution. If this trend continued, the carbon dioxide level would have become too low to support life on Earth. Human fossil fuel use and clearing land for crops have boosted carbon dioxide from its lowest level in the history of the Earth back to 400 parts per million today.
At 400 parts per million, all our food crops, forests, and natural ecosystems are still on a starvation diet for carbon dioxide. The optimum level of carbon dioxide for plant growth, given enough water and nutrients, is about 1,500 parts per million, nearly four times higher than today. Greenhouse growers inject carbon-dioxide to increase yields. Farms and forests will produce more if carbon-dioxide keeps rising.
We have no proof increased carbon dioxide is responsible for the earth’s slight warming over the past 300 years. There has been no significant warming for 18 years while we have emitted 25 per cent of all the carbon dioxide ever emitted. Carbon dioxide is vital for life on Earth and plants would like more of it. Which should we emphasize to our children?
Saturday, March 21, 2015
World Water Crisis
The UN has urged world leaders to rethink water policies or face a 40 per cent shortfall in just 15 years.
People don't care. Aquifers all over the world - including the US - are being depleted at an alarming rate. The ground in some places in the US has subsided by tens of feet over the past fifty years because the aquifers have all been drained. It takes tens of thousands of years for that water to accumulate and it's extracted in quantities that cannot be sustained. There are some places in the world that are not suited for agriculture on a large scale, and we're going to have another Dust Bowl situation if we keep this up and run out of groundwater.
Of course they mention "climate change" in the article. That lie is a given. Climate changes all the time, that's not the problem, the problem is people wasting resources. We've seen what happens when you try to farm in the desert, when you try to squeeze people into areas that can not support large populations (there is no problem with overpopulation, the population is just not spread out efficiently enough).
There is more than enough food in the world. The US throws away enough food to feed the entire world. The problem is that food is not distributed properly. If agriculture and food distribution were organised effectively then no one would need to attempt farming in deserts and depleting aquifers. But governments can't even let people vote for self-determination, so what hope is there for feeding the millions of malnourished?
People don't care. Aquifers all over the world - including the US - are being depleted at an alarming rate. The ground in some places in the US has subsided by tens of feet over the past fifty years because the aquifers have all been drained. It takes tens of thousands of years for that water to accumulate and it's extracted in quantities that cannot be sustained. There are some places in the world that are not suited for agriculture on a large scale, and we're going to have another Dust Bowl situation if we keep this up and run out of groundwater.
Of course they mention "climate change" in the article. That lie is a given. Climate changes all the time, that's not the problem, the problem is people wasting resources. We've seen what happens when you try to farm in the desert, when you try to squeeze people into areas that can not support large populations (there is no problem with overpopulation, the population is just not spread out efficiently enough).
There is more than enough food in the world. The US throws away enough food to feed the entire world. The problem is that food is not distributed properly. If agriculture and food distribution were organised effectively then no one would need to attempt farming in deserts and depleting aquifers. But governments can't even let people vote for self-determination, so what hope is there for feeding the millions of malnourished?
Saturday, March 14, 2015
Record Antarctic Sea Ice
Antarctic sea ice has expanded to its greatest extent since records have been kept.
At the same time 20 of the US states have experienced the coldest temperatures on record for those states. Coldness records are being broken all the time. 2014 was the coldest year in at least a decade. Not only has no warming been measured since 1998, but the Earth has seen marked cooling since then, despite increase in atmospheric CO2.
Now I am a real environmentalist. I want poachers to be shot dead in the face, I want whaling ships to be sunk, I want to see pollution cleaned up, overfishing and deforestation to stop, I want farm animals to be treated humanely and not pumped full of vaccines, and dangerous and unnecessary GMO crops to be eliminated, and I want the people responsible for damaging the environment to be punished to the maximum extent possible. That said, global warming, or climate change, is a total scam. It is a hoax, a fraud, the biggest pack of lies ever perpetrated in the history of humanity. The single biggest factor in the Earth's climate is the Sun, which is beginning a 30 year cooling cycle like it did during the 1970s when there was a scientific consensus that a new ice age was about to begin and nuclear bombs should be set off in the Arctic to melt all the ice and save humanity. Human impact on the environment is disastrous, but human impact on the climate is almost negligible.
At the same time 20 of the US states have experienced the coldest temperatures on record for those states. Coldness records are being broken all the time. 2014 was the coldest year in at least a decade. Not only has no warming been measured since 1998, but the Earth has seen marked cooling since then, despite increase in atmospheric CO2.
Now I am a real environmentalist. I want poachers to be shot dead in the face, I want whaling ships to be sunk, I want to see pollution cleaned up, overfishing and deforestation to stop, I want farm animals to be treated humanely and not pumped full of vaccines, and dangerous and unnecessary GMO crops to be eliminated, and I want the people responsible for damaging the environment to be punished to the maximum extent possible. That said, global warming, or climate change, is a total scam. It is a hoax, a fraud, the biggest pack of lies ever perpetrated in the history of humanity. The single biggest factor in the Earth's climate is the Sun, which is beginning a 30 year cooling cycle like it did during the 1970s when there was a scientific consensus that a new ice age was about to begin and nuclear bombs should be set off in the Arctic to melt all the ice and save humanity. Human impact on the environment is disastrous, but human impact on the climate is almost negligible.
Wednesday, March 4, 2015
The Covert Origins of ISIS
The US government created ISIS as a means of taking out Assad of
Syria since he is an ally of Putin and the last leader in the region who
opposes US hegemony. Simultaneously posted on The Urban Mystic. Runs 21 minutes.
Tuesday, March 3, 2015
King Abdullah Claims World War III
Jordain's king Adbullah has made the claim that ISIS (ISIL, The Islamic State, call them what you will) is trying to start a world war and they need to be stopped now before they can do that.
This has to be unified. I’ve said this to leaders both in the Islamic and Arab world and to the world in general: This is a third World War by other means. This brings Muslims, Christians, other religions together in this generational fight that all of us have to be in this together.Meanwhile Obola says these people aren't Muslims and that saying they are "gives them the legitimacy they want." Well shit, they claim they are Muslims, they quote the Quran, the Muslim king of Jordain says they're Muslims, but Obola, who has no problem talking about bad Christians and bad Jews, constantly spouts the No True Muslim fallacy. No true Muslim would ever do something bad, so if someone does something bad that person cannot be a Muslim, according to Obola. There are bad people in every religion, and the Islamic State people are bad Muslims, and they need to be exterminated. The good Muslims in Egypt and Jordain are doing an alright job fighting them, but nerve gas dropped from US jets would do an even better job.
So it’s not a Western fight. This is a fight inside of Islam where everybody comes together against these outlaws, so to speak, together. And there’s a short-term part of this which is the military part of the issue. There is the medium part which is the security element of it. And then there’s a long-term element of this, which is obviously the ideological one.
Sunday, March 1, 2015
Three Parent Babies
Sick freaks, monsters want to create three parent embryos. No one has
any idea what the results will be in humans. The big lie is that it will
create super babies (eugenics), but there is a good chance it will
create horribly disabled babies. But the freaks don't care, they want to
ram this Frankenstein science through as fast as possible.
Prof Stuart Newman, Professor of Cell Biology and Anatomy at New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States, explains the scientific case against the creation of three-parent embryos.
Prof Stuart Newman, Professor of Cell Biology and Anatomy at New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States, explains the scientific case against the creation of three-parent embryos.
Friday, February 27, 2015
Largest Supermassive Black Hole Discovered
Astronomers have just discovered the largest and brightest supermassive black hole to date. SDSS J010013.02+280225.8 is 12 billion times the mass of the Sun and 429 trillion times brighter. It is still unknown how these supermassive black holes could have formed at the early stages of the universe.
Wednesday, February 25, 2015
Tuesday, February 24, 2015
Melissa Melendez vs. CAIR
California assemblywoman Melissa Melendez has recieved a warning from CAIR, the covert terrorist group that is trying to islamicise America, for comments she made after ISIS murdered Kayla Mueller. So far she has not apologized for her comments.
CAIR representative Haroon Manjlai used almost the same talking points in an interview with KABC-TV in Los Angeles: “Hate rhetoric such as this can and does lead to hate crimes and dehumanizes a whole population, and we feel it’s extremely insensitive to say something like this about the faith of 1.6 billion people.”
Hateful rhetoric. Like how Muhammad said that at the end of time even the trees and rocks will cry out "there is a Jew hiding behind me, come and kill him!" No, that's not hateful rhetoric that "dehumanizes a whole population."
CAIR representative Haroon Manjlai used almost the same talking points in an interview with KABC-TV in Los Angeles: “Hate rhetoric such as this can and does lead to hate crimes and dehumanizes a whole population, and we feel it’s extremely insensitive to say something like this about the faith of 1.6 billion people.”
Hateful rhetoric. Like how Muhammad said that at the end of time even the trees and rocks will cry out "there is a Jew hiding behind me, come and kill him!" No, that's not hateful rhetoric that "dehumanizes a whole population."
UFO Crash in Canada
Reports of a crashed flying saucer recovered from the frozen Lake Winnipeg in Manitoba, Canada, are being fiercely denied by officials, who claim this was just a training exercise. The Canadian military taking part in the supposed exercise are making threats to civilians as they attempt to secure the area. There are reports of a supposed short takeoff and landing (STOL) aircraft taking part in the exercises.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)